GRE考试作文的经典范文总结1.pdf

智 课 网 G R E 备 考 资 料 GRE考试作文的经典范文总结1 GRE考试作文的经典句式分类总结。新GRE写作部分的备考过程不 同于GRE考试的其他部分，比如数学部分需要多做习题进行练习，而新 GRE作文需要积累大量的写作素材才能在写作的过程中有东西可写，背 诵一些经典句式对于快速提高自己的GRE写作有很大作用的。 新GRE写作 范文第一篇文章 Hospital statistics regarding people who go to the emergency room after rollerskating accidents indicate the need for more protective equipment. Within this group of people, 75 percent of those who had accidents in streets or parking lots were not wearing any protective clothing (helmets, knee pads, etc.) or any light-reflecting material (clip-on lights, glow-in-the-dark wrist pads, etc.). Clearly, these statistics indicate that by investing in high-quality protective gear and reflective equipment, rollerskaters will greatly reduce their risk of being severely injured in an accident. 原题逻辑顺序为：数据显示了对保护装备的需求==〉展开说明这 个数据是怎样显示这样的需求的(即用这个装备有什么效果)==〉结论： 为了达到这个效果我们应该重金买这保护设备。 Benchmark 6 The notion that protective gear reduces the injuries suffered in accidents seems at first glance to be an obvious conclusion. After all, it is the intent of these products to either prevent accidents from occuring in the first place or to reduce the injuries suffered by the wearer should an accident occur. 前两句首先肯定 了原命题中值得肯定的地方。这是求同存异的表现。注意这里第一句作 者同意原命题的同时 ，在第二句紧接着就给出了展开的证明。而没有光 是罗列观点。However, the conclusion that investing in high quality protective gear greatly reduces the risk of being severely injured in an accident may mask other (and potentially more significant) causes of injuries and may inspire people to over invest financially and psychologically in protective gear. 再说原命 题是存在逻辑漏洞的，即它因。这里并没有展开论证 ，因为这是全文的 中心句，整个文章都在后面给予论证。同时 ，最后半句给出了论据中的 潜在后果。 First of all, as mentioned in the argument, there are two distinct kinds of gear -- preventative gear (such as light reflecting material) and protective gear (such as helmets). body打头第一段 是属于攻击总前提假设的，作者认为这个(即保护性设备和防护性设备的 差别)是有必要在讨论一切之前弄清楚的。论证方法为质疑假设，加条件 后讨论，提出建议。实际上 ，这个前提对应的就是开头