老年人疼痛强度评估量表的选择_刘雪琴.pdf

2004 3 39 3 ·165 · 刘雪琴　李漓 　:4 , 。: 6165 。(VAS)、(NRS)、 (VDS)(FPS-R), 。: 17 , 44 , 81.7 , 54 (88.5%), 7 (11.5%)。4 Spearman 0. 84 ～0.94。。FPS-R 。:4 , FPS-R 。FPS-R、VDS NRS 3 , , 。 　;　;　;　 The selection of pain intensity assessment scales in Chinese elders/LIU Xueqin, LI Li//Chinese Journal of Nursing,-2004,3 (3): 165. Abstract　Objectives:o investigate the usefulness of four commonly used pain intensity assessment scales in Chinese older adults, and pro- vide data for selecting the right tool to assess elderly pain.Method:A convenience sample of 61 older adultswas recruited for this study.A re- membered painwas measured with four pain assessment scales laid out in random order:the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), Verbal Descriptor Scale (VDS)and Faces Pain Scale Revised (FPS-R).Results:he sample consisted of 17 males and 44 fe- males with a mean age of 81.7years.Fifty-four (88.5%)were cognitively intact, seven (11.5%)had some degree of cognitive impairment. Spearman rank correlation coefficients between pain ratingson the four scales rangedfrom 0.84 to 0.94.he elder coulduse at least one scale to report pain intensity.FPS-R had the lowest error rate and highest scale preference.Conclusions:he findings suggestthat all four scales can be used to assess elderly pain, but FPS-R emerges as the best scale.A mini pain assessment ruler that incorporates a FPS-R, NRS and VDS may be cognitively appropriate and practical to assess elderly pain. Key words　Elderly;　Pain intensity;　Pain assessment;　Scale Author s address　Department of Nursing, Zhujiang Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510280 　　, 、。、 。 。 [1] , 。 1.2　 [2] 1.2.1　 。 , Folstein197