- 1、本文档共11页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
法律英语case brief
1Title :Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas
2 Facts: Summarize the facts of the case. List only the essential facts that you need to understand the holding and reasoning of the case.?minors of the Negro race, through their legal representatives, seek the aid of the courts in obtaining admission to the public schools of their community on a nonsegregated basis. In each instance, they had been denied admission to schools attended by white children under laws requiring or permitting segregation according to race. This segregation was alleged to deprive the plaintiffs of the equal protection of the laws under the Fourteenth Amendment.
This case is a consolidation of several different cases from Kansas, South Carolina, Virginia, and Delaware. Several black children (through their legal representatives, Ps) sought admission to public schools that required or permitted segregation based on race. The plaintiffs alleged that segregation was unconstitutional under the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
In all but one case, a three judge federal district court cited Plessy v. Ferguson in denying relief under the 搒eparate but equal?doctrine. On appeal to the Supreme Court, the plaintiffs contended that segregated schools were not and could not be made equal and that they were therefore deprived of equal protection of the laws.
3 Procd edure: Most of the cases that youll read in law school will be appellate court decisions. In this section, you want to list what happened in the lower court(s). Do not go into too much detail. One or two sentences are sufficient for this section.
In each of the cases other than the Delaware case, a three-judge federal district court denied relief to the plaintiffs on the so-called separate but equal doctrine announced by this Court in Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 U.S. 537. Under that doctrine, equality of treatment is accorded when the races are provided substantially equal facilities, even though these facilities be separ
您可能关注的文档
- 仿真元件对照表.docx
- 伦巴舞步中英对照.doc
- 模块八第一单元单词讲解及练习题.doc
- Unit4 words补.doc
- 当个伴娘居然有这么多鬼要求.docx
- Easyui validatebox修改.doc
- 健身动作中英文对照.docx
- 拉丁舞基本步的名子.doc
- CAD命令及常见问题处理.doc
- 备注知识点(思科).docx
- 2023-2024学年广东省深圳市龙岗区高二(上)期末物理试卷(含答案).pdf
- 2023-2024学年贵州省贵阳市普通中学高一(下)期末物理试卷(含答案).pdf
- 21.《大自然的声音》课件(共45张PPT).pptx
- 2023年江西省吉安市吉安县小升初数学试卷(含答案).pdf
- 2024-2025学年广东省清远市九校联考高一(上)期中物理试卷(含答案).pdf
- 广东省珠海市六校联考2024-2025学年高二上学期11月期中考试语文试题.pdf
- 2024-2025学年语文六年级上册第4单元-单元素养测试(含答案).pdf
- 2024-2025学年重庆八中高三(上)月考物理试卷(10月份)(含答案).pdf
- 安徽省安庆市潜山市北片学校联考2024-2025学年七年级上学期期中生物学试题(含答案).pdf
- 贵州省部分校2024-2025学年九年级上学期期中联考数学试题(含答案).pdf
文档评论(0)