语用学原版论9.pdfVIP

Journal of Pragmatics 39 (2007) 1105–1119 /locate/pragma ‘Opposites’ in discourse: A comparison of antonym use across four domains Steven Jones * School of Education, The University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL, UK Received 5 November 2005; received in revised form 16 July 2006; accepted 25 November 2006 Abstract The status of antonymy as a widespread and important feature of language has never been in question (see Lyons, 1977; Cruse, 1986, 2000, etc.). Using data from individual written corpora, the various discourse functions of ‘opposites’ have recently been identified (Justeson and Katz, 1991; Mettinger, 1994) and quantified (Jones, 2002; Jones and Murphy, 2005). Building on these studies, this paper presents a broader, comparative analysis of how antonyms operate in four different domains: Adult-Produced Writing (using a corpus of Independent newspaper data); Adult-Produced Speech (using the spoken component of the British National Corpus); Child-Produced Speech and Child-Directed Speech (both using selected corpora from the CHILDES database). The paper addresses issues relating to acquisition (such as the extent to which antonym output in childhood is input-dependent and age-related), considers inter-corpus differences between antonym use, and assesses the methodological value and limits of exploring linguistic phenomena across differently comprised corpora. # 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Keywords: Antonymy (ancillary, coordinated); Discourse functions; Child language; Corpus linguistics; CHILDES; BNC 1. Introduction The aim of this paper is to gauge the degree to which our understanding of a lexical relation can be enhanced by assessing its discou