- 1、本文档共4页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
GMAT写作题库范文(二十二)-智课教育
智 课 网 G M A T 备 考 资
料
GMAT写作题库范文(二十二)-智课教育
写作是个厚积薄发的考试,同学们在备考GMAT写作时,不仅要多
练习,也要去掌握一些重点语句。有些题库范文是需要大家掌握并且熟
练记忆的,熟记于心才能运用自如,才能举一反三。接下来小编就给大
家介绍一下GMAT写作范文,希望对大家备考GMAT写作考试有帮助。
22. The following appeared in the editorial section of a
newspaper.
“As public concern over drug abuse has increased,
authorities have become more vigilant in their efforts to prevent
illegal drugs from entering the country. Many drug traffickers
have consequently switched from marijuana, which is bulky, or
heroin, which has a market too small to justify the risk of severe
punishment, to cocaine. Thus enforcement efforts have ironically
resulted in an observed increase in the illegal use of cocaine.”
Discuss how well reasoned... etc.
报纸的社论:
由于公众对滥用药物的情况越来越关注,权威人士更警惕地防止非
法药物进入国内。许多毒贩子已经从大体积的大麻和市场太小因而风险
很高的海洛因转向了可卡因。监管的努力讽刺性的导致了可见的非法使
用可卡因的增长。
The conclusion in this argument is that increased vigilance
by drug enforcement authorities has resulted in an increase in
the illegal use of cocaine. The author reaches this conclusion on
the grounds that drug traffickers have responded to increased
enforcement efforts by switching from bulkier and riskier drugs
to cocaine. Presumably, the author’s reasoning is that the
increased enforcement efforts inadvertently brought about an
increase in the supply of cocaine which, in turn, brought about
the observed increase in the illegal use of cocaine. This line of
reasoning is problematic in two important respects.
In the first place, the author has engaged in “after this,
therefore because of this” reasoning. The only reason offered
for believing that the increased vigilance caused the increase in
cocaine use is the fact that the former preceded the latter. No
additional evidence linking the two events is offered in the
argument, thus leaving open the possibility that the two events
are not causally related but merely correlated. This in tu
您可能关注的文档
最近下载
- 2025年高考数学第一轮复习一轮复习83练目录.docx
- 下水道疏通工人培训课件.pptx
- 国有企业党委书记2024年民主生活会个人对照检查发言材料(四个带头).docx VIP
- 《国有企业管理人员处分条例》重点解读.pptx VIP
- 2024年民主生活会个人对照检查发言材料(四个带头).docx VIP
- 领导干部2024年民主生活会对照检查发言材料(四个带头).docx VIP
- 2025届河北省高考化学二轮复习计划安排 课件.pptx
- 《国有企业管理人员处分条例》学习解读课件.pptx VIP
- 人教版(2024)英语七年级下册Unit2 No Rules,No Order单元小测(含解析).docx VIP
- 2025届高考一轮复习:小说叙事艺术.pptx VIP
文档评论(0)