- 1、本文档共17页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
“Indoor Air Pollution” Framing Issues
“Indoor Air Pollution”Framing Issues Risk Factor Exposure Outcomes Background Disease Counterfactual Risk Factor Household solid fuel use Clearly polluting in nearly all settings Available in household surveys Most common metric in epi studies Expands risk boundary Portion of outdoor air pollution Burns Other non-air-pollution pathways, e.g. risks of gathering biomass fuel and coal mining -? Even a portion of climate change due to household fuels-? Include high-income countries where much wood is used in households, but not for cooking-? Difficulties of Household Solid Fuel Use as RF Exposures are not uniform because Coal and biomass are different Amount of usage usually not known Difficulty of separating cooking from the heating often done in non-tropical settings Chimneys dominate in richer countries and are found in poor ones – effectiveness variable Location of cooking in household not uniform, which affects exposure A set of the major interventions being explored are low-emissions biomass stoves Exposure Few studies used direct exposure assessment, i.e., average air pollution concentration affecting people, which roughly corresponds to annual means used in outdoor air pollution studies Reviews of health effects need to capture a wide range of indicators of exposures, incl: Solid fuel vs. another (cleaner) fuel Time spent near stove Duration of exposure (years) to solid fuels Separate kitchen from main house Improved vs. Traditional stove How to combine? And do so in a way consistent with available household fuel inventories Outcome Measures A growing number of outcomes are associated with exposures Some have dozens of epi studies, i.e. ALRI, COPD, lung cancer from coal – outcomes from CRA-2000 Some have less than 10 with consistent results, i.e., LBW and cataracts Some have less than 10 with some inconsistency, i.e., TB, lung cancer from biomass Some have few studies but would be expected from other pollution exposures (outdoor air, ETS, and smoking), i
文档评论(0)