依托咪酯在老年患者无痛结肠镜检查中应用价值随机对照研究.doc

依托咪酯在老年患者无痛结肠镜检查中应用价值随机对照研究.doc

  1. 1、本文档共9页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
依托咪酯在老年患者无痛结肠镜检查中应用价值随机对照研究

依托咪酯在老年患者无痛结肠镜检查中应用价值的随机对照研究   【摘要】 目的:探讨依托咪酯在老年患者无痛结肠镜检查中的疗效及安全性。方法:选取2014年1月-2015年12月于笔者所在医院内镜室进行结肠镜检查的老年患者156例为研究对象,随机分为研究组和对照组,各78例。对照组采用静脉注射芬太尼后注射丙泊酚的麻醉方案,研究组采用静脉注射芬太尼后注射依托咪酯的方案。观察两者的麻醉效果,监测麻醉诱导前、诱导后1 min、进镜后4 min及9 min、出镜时、苏醒时患者的生命体征情况及不良反应等安全性评价。结果:对照组的起效时间与操作时间分别是(1.53±0.39)、(18.36±3.71)min,研究组分别是(1.49±0.41)、(17.57±4.13)min,两组麻醉起效时间和结肠镜操作时间比较差异均无统计学意义(P0.05)。诱导后1 min、进镜后4 min及进镜后9 min,对照组平均动脉压(MAP)和血氧饱和度(SpO2)均下降,心率(HR)减慢,与麻醉诱导前比较差异均有统计学意义(P0.05);在相同观察点,对照组的MAP、SpO2及HR均低于研究组,差异均有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:依托咪酯在老年患者无痛结肠镜检查中是安全有效的,对老年患者的循环和呼吸影响较小,注射痛较轻,是安全舒适的麻醉方案 【关键词】 依托咪酯; 老年患者; 无痛肠镜检查 中图分类号 R722.17 文献标识码 B 文章编号 1674-6805(2016)24-0012-03 【Abstract】 Objective:To investigate the efficacy and safety of Etomidate in elderly patients undergoing painless colonoscopy.Method:From January 2014 to December 2015 in our hospital 156 elderly patients undergoing painless colonoscopy were selected.They were randomly divided into research group applying the anesthesia scheme of Fentanyl combined with Etomidate and control group applying the anesthesia scheme of Fentanyl combined with Propofol.Heart rate(HR),mean arterial pressure(MAP),oxygen saturation(SpO2) and adverse reactions were observed between the two groups at the point of before anesthesia induction,one minute after induction,four minutes and nine minutes after into the mirror,checking end,waking up.Result:The onset time and operation time of the control group were (1.53±0.39)minutes and (18.36±3.71)minutes,while these of the research group were respectively (1.49±0.41)minutes and (17.57±4.13)minutes.There were not statistically different between the two groups(P0.05).Compared with the time of before anesthesia induction,there were statistically significant differences in the HR,MAP and SpO2 of the control group at the points of one minute after induction,four minutes and nine minutes after into the mirror(P0.05).At the same point,there were statistically significant differences between the two groups in the HR,MAP a

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

linsspace + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档