ICU非计划性拔管的特征分析及对策.doc

  1. 1、本文档共6页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
ICU非计划性拔管的特征分析及对策

综合护理干预对肿瘤患者PICC并发症的影响 郑 艳,赵敏丽,蒋 恽,朱 燕,邵文娟,施浩婷,张爱萍 (宁波市鄞州第二医院,浙江 宁波 315100) [摘 要] 目的 评估综合性干预措施对成人肿瘤患者PICC并发症的预防作用。方法 对观察组107例肿瘤PICC患者实施综合干预措施,即将护理再教育作为科室的持续质量改进项目,在置管后给予多磺酸粘多糖乳膏外涂、X线辅助导管定位、最大化消毒屏障管理等,与本科室既往129例肿瘤患者的PICC并发症进行比较。结果 ⑴对照组和观察组PICC并发症总发生率分别为40.3%和11.2%,差异有统计学意义(χ2=25.051,P<0.01),观察组的机械性静脉炎、导管堵塞和导管异位发生率明显低于对照组(P<0.05)。Impact of Multifaceted Interventions on Complications of Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter in Oncology Patients* ZHENG Yan, ZHAO Min-li, JIANG Hui, ZHU Yan, SHAO Wen-juan, SHI Hao-ting, ZHANG Ai-ping (The Second Hospital of Yinzhou County, Ningbo 315100, China) Corresponding author: ZHANG Ai-ping, Email: zhangaiping100@yahoo.cn 【Abstract】Objective To evaluate the efficacy of multifaceted interventions in reducing complications of peripherally inserted central venous catheter (PICC) in adult oncology patients. Methods The control subjects who were not received multifaceted interventions were collected from January to June in 2006 in our department. Multifaceted interventions were implemented in observational group from July to October in 2006. These interventions include: nurse reeducation, X-ray guided reposition, early use of mucopolysaccharide polysulfate cream, maintenance of maximum sterile barrier precaution, etc. The complication rates of PICC were compared between the two groups. Results ⑴Compared with the controls, the observational group was associated with a 72.2% decrease in the overall complication rate (11.2% vs 40.3%, χ2=25.051, P<0.01). ⑵The complication rates of phlebitis, occlusion, malposition, thrombosis, accidental dislodgement and PICC associated infection were 15.5%(20/129), 10.8%(14/129), 7.7%(10/129), 2.3%(3/129), 2.3%(3/129), 1.6%(2/129) in the control group, and 4.7%(5/107), 1.9%(2/107), 1.9%(2/107), 0.9%(1/107), 0.9%(1/107), 0.9%(1/107) in the observational group. The complication rates of phlebitis, occlusion and malposition differed significantly between the two groups. Conclusion The results suggest

文档评论(0)

zhuliyan1314 + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档