SCI论文写作要点及选刊及投稿注意事项(心血管)照日格图.ppt

SCI论文写作要点及选刊及投稿注意事项(心血管)照日格图.ppt

  1. 1、本文档共56页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
RESULTS—Of 900 patients receiving LM75/25 and 918 patients receiving glargine who completed initiation, 473 and 419, respectively, had A1C #7.0% and continued into maintenance. Baseline characteristics except age were similar in this group. Median time of maintaining the A1C goal was 16.8 months for LM75/25 (95%CI 14.0–19.7) and 14.4 months for glargine (95% CI 13.4–16.8; P = 0.040). A1C goal was maintained in 202 LM75/25-treated patients (43%) and in 147 glargine-treated patients (35%; P = 0.006). No differences were observed in overall, nocturnal, or severe hypoglycemia. LM75/25 patients had higher total daily insulin dose (0.45 6 0.21 vs. 0.37 6 0.21 units/kg/day) and more weight gain (5.4 6 5.8 vs. 3.7 6 5.6 kg) from baseline. Patients taking LM75/25 and glargine with lower baseline A1C levels were more likely to maintain the A1C goal (P = 0.043 and P , 0.001, respectively). Diabetes Care 34:249–255, 2011 结 论 Conclusion 这一部分一般也就用1~3句话。很多摘 要只用一句话表示结论。例如: Conclusion Patients who received their first CABG surgery without cardiopul-monary bypass had improved cognitive outcomes 3 months after the procedure, but the effects were limited and became negligible at 12 months. 谓语动词用一般过去时。 Conclusions Exercise capacity is a more powerful predictor of mortality among men than other established risk factors for cardiovascular disease. 仅一句话,谓语动词用了一般现在时。 结论部分,内容上要紧紧围绕或针对研究的目的和取得的结果叙述,不应扩大范围、慎重使用或不用推测的语句、也不应对研究本身进行评论或褒奖(这种作法在国内作者写的摘要中经常出现)。应当“就事论事”。 至于对研究本身的意义或价值,应等待其他研究人员重复或有关部门进行评价、鉴定,而且这种鉴定或评价的结果也不是写进论文摘要中的内容。 “This paper reported application of the new technique in China for the first time. ” 所说的研究可能确实在国内是首次报告应用这种技术,但结论中只应谈应用的结果说明这种技术是否适用,对诊断治疗有何作用等,没有必要说明是否是第一次应用。很多情况下,证明某件事是第一次是很难作到的。 The present study provides theoretical and experimental basis for pathogenesis of the syndrome. This study paved the way to establishment of new treatment for the disease. 这些说法都是空洞的,往往是过于夸大的,是脱离研究内容本身的语句,应绝对避免。 引 言 IN

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

xuefei111 + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档