我国商标近似、商品类似的判定标准、问题及出路.pdfVIP

我国商标近似、商品类似的判定: 标准、问题及出路 刘庆辉 内容提要:根据我国商标法的规定，商标近似、商品类似既是商标确权的判定标准，也是商标侵 权的判定标准。我国司法解释和行政规章对商标近似、商品类似的判定，均采混淆标准，这在我国目 前的商标法框架下，能有效地保护在先商标权，具有合理性。但是，据此判定商标近似、商品类似， 在实践中也出现裁判结论不一的问题，引起争议。因此，有必要实现商标近似、商品类似判定标准的 客观化。为此，要重新梳理商标近似、商品类似与商标侵权的关系，在商标法中明确采纳商标侵权混 淆可能性标准，并明确商标近似、商品类似仅是影响混淆可能性的两个因素，并非商标侵权的充分必 要条件。 关键词:商标近似商品类似侵权标准混淆可能性 Abstract: The similarity to the registered trademark and commodities is the determinant factor for the granting and infringing the trademark right , in accordance with Chinese trademark law.ηle determination of the similarity in judicial interpretation and administrative regulations adopts the confusing principle , which could better protect the prior trademark right effectively and reasonably in the current trademark law sy如m. But this also leads ωsuch situation where the judicial decisions would be different 企om and conflict with each other.ηlere岛re，让 IS necess缸yωmake an object principle ωdetermine the similarity. So the relation between 也esm咀larity to trademark and commodities and trademark right in企ingement should be reconsidered carefully. The likelihood of confusion principle in the trademark right in企ingement should be explicit1y provided in the trademark law. Whats more , it is of vital importance to understand that the simi1arity to trademark and commodities are just two factors in determining the likelihood of confusion, not the necessary and sufficient condition 岛r trademark right infringement. Key Words: sin咀larity to trademark; similarity to commodities; in企ingement conditions; the like1ihood of confusion 的侵权判定标准。何谓商标近似、商品类似，商 一、我国商标近似、商品类似的判定 标法也没有明确界定。根据最高人民法院《关于 标准:混淆可能性 审理商标民事纠纷案件适用法律若干问题的解 商标权保护的根本宗旨是防止消费者混淆， 释 (法释 [2002J 32号)的规定