“坐失”与“流失”从中俄比较看国企改革争论(上)(国外英文资料).doc

“坐失”与“流失”从中俄比较看国企改革争论(上)(国外英文资料) The business weekly: Chinese nowadays about the reform debate is still in progress, we hope to jump out of the argument itself, starting from the experience and lessons of the Russian transition, talk about the reference to what China. Shortly before you in the translation of the sale of the century this book is also proposed to learn from the neighbors misfortune, impressed us. For the reform and transformation in 27 years Chinese, now began to reflect on the left or right, the good or bad of market economy, market economy, neighbors are unfortunately what kind of role? Zhang Chunlin: I translated after the sale of the century, wrote a translation. It was in the spring of 2004, I was the biggest feeling is that a lot of problems occur during the process of privatization in Russia, with us in the reform of state-owned enterprises is a very similar, so I actually wrote the article is to remind you, do not blindly arrogant, do not think the Russian people in a complete mess everything is very good, we. The business weekly: a domestic reform debate, analysis from Professor Lang Xianping about the reform of state-owned enterprises and discusses the case, he believes that state-owned enterprises through management buyouts (MBO) accelerated the loss of state-owned assets, which is very unfair, is actually hired managers to steal his assets in the absence of trust obligation and under the condition of asymmetric information; then by the efficiency of the state-owned enterprises and private enterprises, he believes that the efficiency of state-owned enterprises may be higher than the efficiency of private enterprises so the state-owned enterprise property right reform mode should be revised. Your investigation and research over the past 10 years has been committed to the restructuring of state-owned enterprises, do you think what he said is reasonable? How to correctly understand the problem of privatization of state-owned enterprises? Zhan