五、论文（设计）成绩评定标准V.AcademicDissertation.PDFVIP

五、论文（设计）成绩评定标准/V. Academic Dissertation Grading Standards ㈠指导教师对论文（设计）评价的指标、评价等级及对应的得分/ (1)Academic Dissertation Grading by Supervisor 评价等级及对应得分/Levels and Grades 评价指标/Standards 优秀 良好 中等 合格 不合格 /Distinction /Merit /Satisfactory /Pass /Fail 1.选题与研究主旨/ Topic Choosing Research Purpose 19-20 17-18 15-16 12-14 12 2.写作过程 / Writing Progress 19-20 17-18 15-16 12-14 12 3.总体结构及逻辑性 / Structures and Logicality 19-20 17-18 15-16 12-14 12 4.能力水平 / Research Ability 19-20 17-18 15-16 12-14 12 5.成果质量 / Overall Quality 19-20 17-18 15-16 12-14 12 评价指标的含义/Details of Standards 1.选题与研究主旨：选题需符合本专业培养目标，体现综合训练的基本要求，运用一手资料或经过本人统计分析的二手 数据进行实证研究。研究主旨明确，具有较强的文献基础和理论支撑，应用了问卷调查或案例分析等适当的研究方法，并进行假 设检验，内容难易程度适中,预期结论具有一定的理论意义和学术价值。/1. Topic Choosing Research Purpose: The topic is well linked with student’s curriculum education target, and shows the student’s comprehensive study, the first-hand materials or second-hand data analyzed by student should be used in research. The research problem is clear and has strong theoretical base, the survey, case study or other appropriate methodology with hypothesis testing is chosen and well designed. The expected research result needs to show the academic meaning. 2.写作过程：学生写作态度认真，按照规定的时间提交选题、提纲、初稿等，能够与教师及时沟通，按照指导教师的要求 修改报告。不能未经过教师同意擅自改题。/2. Writing Progress : Students should have serious attitude, submit topic, outline, draft and other materials on time. Students need to communicate with