- 1、本文档共8页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
合法预期论文我国行政法合法预期保护原则之确立
合法预期论文:我国行政法合法预期保护原则之确立
【中文摘要】对行政法基本原则的研究能够起到深化行政法学研究和完善行政法制的重大作用,为适当约束行政机关的行政行为,保护行政管理相对人的合法利益,我国行政法中规定了信赖保护原则,但由于该原则范围较狭窄,在实际操作中受到诸多限制。因此,西方一些国家行政法中存在的合法预期保护原则为我们带来了更广阔的思路。合法预期保护的概念源于德国法,此后,在欧盟、法国、英国、美国等国家的行政法中得以广泛应用。本文拟在了解西方主要国家在合法预期保护制度的基础上,针对我国现状,提出确立我国行政法合法预期保护原则的框架以及相应的保护机制和措施。
【英文摘要】To build a credible government, constrain the administrative organs , protect the legitimate interests of the private party in administration ,the administrative law formulated the principle of The faith protection .But in practice, the faith protection principles are not adapted to the circumstances, the executive authorities of the administrative process is necessarily restricted. Some Western countries have legitimate expectations in administrative law principle of protection brought us new ideas, the principles can promote the Administrative guidance , administrative compensation and other systems and theories of reconstruction and reflection, and the give us a new theory of the review and thinking to accelerate the establishment of the rule of law, and make the government of the state and citizens develop a good relationship between.This article is divided into three parts with the gradual in-depth analysis.The first part is about the protection of legitimate expectations. First discusses the protection of legitimate expectations principles in Germany, the European Union, the United Kingdom, and the United States, and second, focuses on the relationship between the legitimate expectations protection principles and The faith protection principles, that the introduction of the principle of legitimate expectations protection reasons, the conclusion is that the legitimate expectations as a standard operational stronger, because in trust protection principle, the focus of the protected object is the executive administrative counterpart behavior from the trust, which is a subjective standard, there are some difficulties identified. The legitimate expectations of civil servants fro
文档评论(0)