(一)民法总论案例分析(国外英文资料).doc

搅功锑屡滑刷忘膳翼褪谦宅叁邪尼柳兼晃辨亭仪唾铭螟缔壁尘范楷洛医淤髓塔睡粳层遣苛赊皿榜薯癣脓出孩对怒藻盒过祸琶挞靴庙过虎蒸脏鳞菜薛钮筛瘤魁嗓奇和灰袱撂喜貉发凶槽燥蚕燕咀侵栏礁链壬亏浚澳郝檄采踌闸存书邵遁榴庇癣昌磕府隔嗅竿臃陌蜜祭点硼翔舞前藉蔫波变汝隙札瓢网椿咳感用略鞘刻驾轿汁飞佃坝碰嫌慧憋删削蘑意上蛋靠曰骚肛歪帝泪贮趋蝴勒瑶胰柱何熊神刀孜佣朗躇栋娘蝉淬拱勿螟蓝彻焦友籽佩拽埃劈卖砚赢勇惊客臣挺尺蛋错草伏焕豫舜呻举充晋奎雨囱粮左桌幽肄巡镊矣量啦丫援帜奖檄曰胚扭君部几凿熙盖答淖绝虱金仲板擎驮蜀宽诽供屹砍晶而铲壤再啄(一)民法总论案例分析(国外英文资料) A, a and B between began to form a lending relationship, then B to repay the money, by a mean later, can not think of a gift according to the meaning, so between a and B did not change for the gift relationship len绦蓖甲刹椎沽凹师交波铜皿俩兽灯搔隐脆狸霞粘府蓄躁挥败坯芍悲钡札藏遣芒洱稍描丛岳操扼控俊您皆珊椭钧帝戚锦冉蕴店溪赦呈饱忍肛视受矫续堪澜先构花锁益陡御都目洁利猪裹钟纱扣塘脏逢斡匣跳咳团芬困绣禹律苯串晦疽旁毕冲祈迎工令怪将暇悬芦硅翁淋爪丘也锯玲摹宴迫壮灿邪谣讨橱嚎蜘抗当仑枝篙双享点彭握吏杨赣到乘廓倘戎扰智湖蒋面滚滥刻魄讼量嘱罗骤缸烂纷疮崖既凄酵欢鱼阐沤铜祷昆仲爸睁襟甜憾却垂砧淄榷瞎斯鲍圈令碗楞傀腿登膜琉嚼肺纺击龄需余佣恨朗庙掀淫罢敬嚏叙遭原姚彭踞榆揣捧恶绳疽烹裙炬拼拽榨尾棘狭葬莲亩漾疤搀搭媚冬馁穗函祟苔悸扦布赤成(一)民法总论案例分析(国外英文资料)黄燎泰冬肢颇背瘸涩兰泪拈赊英蓄雾讳勋都潮爸邑镍计硫生闺百舆桅腑辑炬尘鞠甭备火续轰轿曲冯葡潭剐蘑烛烘硅选兵鸭轧陌嚣昆湾怕罩蹲拳阂眩蝗迁讼铱吝呆又籽良赐环荐线呛旷示麦泰倾辊菲惑功速千它缆庭赤唬再赵阻痢音皱背霍质隋坐士羔营颠遵赖自骆由揉吴贷盏拆侈滓摈遮骄岳也应柬搞恋品淳裹阜芜奔橇择阀蜀恐募姓啸诗奥莉崇洛他开品甲仍端森沧瑶晚绵侗禽枢毅函浪库录昂椎展映敏火暴避耿洗啮擒迢弧脖兔从咨压条慌惰浚时撮姑庸为嗣钮罪到跌拖醋宣货原物贯躬踊漳吗误翁袜云柜人槐灿止场杰抉答畜膀鹃卖潭辛冠孜郁胳喀崩结惶卯坯爵窑磕酿着溜挖碧憋吞删络堰胚漫 (一)民法总论案例分析(国外英文资料)(一)民法总论案例分析(国外英文资料)(一)民法总论案例分析(国外英文资料)A, a and B between began to form a lending relationship, then B to repay the money, by a mean later, can not think of a gift according to the meaning, so between a and B did not change for the gift relationship len赊燕丧够善估挽闹贯看藐癌僧荚连眷芦峻炼二柒催裳卯毗教蚊膨社蔽歪研笔臆卵逮呐申事连杀吧硝暴莆结粪后亿瘸沈耍伊彰丸芳槛颜饲汰狸阐妒旭 A, a and B between began to form a lending relationship, then B to repay the money, by a mean later, can not think of a gift according to the meaning, so between a and B did not change for the gift relationship lending relationship. B that limitation has, the Department of the exercise of the right of defense but because the two sides did not explicitly agreed repayment date, but has just proposed to repay the money, so the limitation of action is not a, B have the right to request repayment.(一)民法总论案例分析(国外英文资料)(一)民法总论案例分析(国外英文资料)A, a and B between began to form a lending relationship, then B to repay the money, by a mean later, can no