论范式转换视域下德里达的解构.pdfVIP

第32卷第3期 青岛科技大学学报 （社会科学版） Vol.32，No.3 2016年9月 Journal of Qingdao University of Science and Technology（Social Sciences) Sep.2016 论范式转换视域下德里达的解构 ○ 吴加才，蒋继华 　　（盐城工学院　人文社会科学学院，江苏　盐城　224051） ［摘　要］托马斯·库恩的范式论意在对传统公度性方法主导的逻各斯进行反叛和解构，以消解绝对性、统一性、基 础性、主体性，消弭科学哲学和人文领域之间的界限，这寓意着一种新的认知结构、批评观念和话语模式的出现。作为解 构主义的代表，德里达以特有的解构策略对西方文化传统进行质疑和解构，暴露西方文化传统的某些虚幻和偏执之处， 体现了后现代所具有的超越风格和积极否定精神，意味着哲学从传统思维范式向后现代思维范式的转型。解构由此成为 范式转换的题中之意。 ［关键词］德里达；解构；范式 ［中图分类号］B5　［文献标识码］A　［文章编号］1671-8372（2016）03-0061-04 On the deconstruction of Derrida from the perspective of paradigm shift WU Jia-cai, JIANG Ji-hua （School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Yancheng Institute of Technology, Yancheng 224051, China） Abstract: The paradigm theory of Thomas Kuhn intends to conduct a rebellion against and deconstruction to the logos, which is dominated by traditional commensurability method, and designs to eliminate the absoluteness, unity, foundation and subjectivity, and then to eliminate the boundary between philosophy of science and humanities domain, which implies the emergence of a new cognitive structure, concept of criticism and the discourse pattern. As a representative of deconstruction, Derrida questions and deconstructs western cultural with his unique deconstruction strategy to expose the paranoid illusions in western culture , which reflects the transcendence and positive spirit of negation of postmodernism. It means that the philosophical thinking pattern from the traditional thinking paradigm turns to the postmodern thinking paradigm. And thus the deconstruction becomes the core of paradigm shift. Derrida; deconstruction; paradigm Key words： 作为解构主义的代表，雅克 德里达以特有的 批判，意味着理论的开放、多变和复杂性的延展，意