The Carl Popper’s Philosophy and Some Implications for Hometown study.doc

下载文档 降价啦

7
0
约1.6万字
约 17页
2017-06-30 发布于福建
举报
版权申诉
保障服务

The Carl Popper’s Philosophy and Some Implications for Hometown study.doc

1、本文档共17页，可阅读全部内容。
2、有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站（book118）网站文档一经付费（服务费），不意味着购买了该文档的版权，仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用，不得用于商业用途，未经授权，严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等，侵权必究。
3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传，本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺！文档内容仅供研究参考，付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费，意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险，本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务；查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档，您可以点击这里二次下载。
4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等，请点击“版权申诉”（推荐），也可以打举报电话：400-050-0827(电话支持时间：9:00-18:30)。

The Carl Popper’s Philosophy and Some Implications for Hometown study

The Carl Popper’s Philosophy and Some Implications for Hometown study 　　【Abstract】Karl Popper explained the scientific knowledge heads from the problem， proposed criteria of demarcation of scientific knowledge is falsifiability and reveals the scientific knowledge growth from problem to problem. Hometown study is one of the characteristics of anthropology in China， its particularity brings certain advantages and disadvantages. In this study， first， try to explain of the two， then try to get some revelations from Poppers philosophy to hometown study. 【Key words】Karl Popper； falsifiability； hometown study Popper is one of the most famous philosophers of science in the contemporary western world. HermannBondi said that “there is no more to science than its method， and there is no more to its method than Popper has said” （quoted from Colin Simkin， 1993， p.1）. In Poppers philosophical thought no ultimate source of knowledge， and he opposed as the source and foundation of scientific with investigating and experience. He is going to falsifiability as a criterion of demarcation. Regard science as an endless，ongoing process，the growth of scientific knowledge is the most interesting instances of knowledge growth. 1. No ultimate source of knowledge Popper thinks the source of knowledge is varied， but no one is authoritative （Popper，1962， p.24）. 1.1 Knowledge does not originate in experience Criticism of the classic view： observation-induction. The empirical science thinks the knowledge known by experience， that experience is the source of all knowledge. Popper （1962） acknowledged intellectual intuition and imagination is extremely important， but it is not reliable （p. 28）. They can show things to us so clearly， but we may also be misleading. Theory for the future， the experience in the past， a theory has a richer content than experience. Popper （1962） admitted that the most function of observation， intuition and even the imagine is to help us criticize tho