- 1、本文档共59页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
消费者生产者与生产效率英文版
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * CONSUMERS, PRODUCERS, AND THE EFFICIENCY OF MARKETS * P Q How a Lower Price Reduces PS If P falls to $30, PS = ? x 15 x $15 = $112.50 Two reasons for the fall in PS. S 1. Fall in PS due to sellers leaving market 2. Fall in PS due to remaining sellersgetting lower P P Q supply curve A. Find marginal seller’s cost at Q = 10. B. Find total PS for P = $20. Suppose P rises to $30.Find the increase in PS due to… C. selling 5 additional units D. getting a higher price on the initial 10 units * A C T I V E L E A R N I N G 2 Producer surplus A C T I V E L E A R N I N G 2 Answers P Q supply curve A. At Q = 10, marginal cost = $20 B. PS = ? x 10 x $20 = $100 P rises to $30. C. PS on additional units= ? x 5 x $10 = $25 D. Increase in PS on initial 10 units= 10 x $10 = $100 * CONSUMERS, PRODUCERS, AND THE EFFICIENCY OF MARKETS * CS, PS, and Total Surplus消费者剩余,生产者剩余,总剩余 CS = (value to buyers) – (amount paid by buyers) = buyers’ gains from participating in the market PS = (amount received by sellers) – (cost to sellers) = sellers’ gains from participating in the market Total surplus = CS + PS = total gains from trade in a market = (value to buyers) – (cost to sellers) CONSUMERS, PRODUCERS, AND THE EFFICIENCY OF MARKETS * P Q $ D S CS of single buyer PS of single seller CS of all buyers PS of all sellers Surplus of the market CS, PS, and Total Surplus消费者剩余,生产者剩余,总剩余 CONSUMERS, PRODUCERS, AND THE EFFICIENCY OF MARKETS * The Market’s Allocation of Resources In a market economy, the allocation of resources is decentralized (权力下放), determined by the interactions of many self-interested buyers and sellers. Is the market’s allocation of resources desirable (合意)? Or would a different allocation of resources make society better off? To answer this, we use total
文档评论(0)