- 1、有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
在麻醉和手术中预防中枢神经系统并发症(双语)
The assumption that anesthesia has no serious, long-term, adverse CNS consequences is probably true for most patients 假设麻醉没有严重的,长期的,中枢神经系统的不良后果,可能是适用于大多数患者。 However, for patients younger than 6 months, or older than 60 years, that assumption is under challenge from a substantial body of evidence. 然而,对于年龄小于6个月或年龄超过60岁的患者,这种假设受到大量证据的挑战。 Fetuses and newborns appear to be at risk because systems that would enable them to fully recover from the effects of more than 2 hours of anesthesia are still in development. In distinction, seniors may be at risk because systems that once enabled full recovery have ever-diminishing capacity. Even for some patients between the age of 6 months and 60 years, full recovery may require replacing apoptosed neurons and pruning dendritic spines … perhaps leaving them not quite the same person that they were before they were anesthetized. 胎儿和新生儿似乎处于危险之中,因为使他们能够从多于2个小时的麻醉中完全恢复的系统仍然在发育中。相对的,老年人可能存在风险是因为可以使他们完全恢复的系统已经日益衰竭。甚至对6个月以下和60岁以上的一些患者中,完全恢复可能需要更换凋亡神经元和修剪树突棘...或许会使他们变得和麻醉前不一样的人。 Factors Aggravating Factors加重的因素 - On-pump vs. Off-pump体外循环与非体外循环 - Inflammation 炎症 - Anesthetics麻醉药 - Deeper vs. Lighter Regional vs. General Anesthesia更深与更浅和区域与全身麻醉 - Anesthesia and Neurodegenerative Diseases 麻醉与神经退行性疾病 Potential Alleviating Factors潜在的缓解因素 - Anesthetics麻醉药 - A Grab Bag of Adjuvants各种辅助剂 - Preconditioning预处理 - Neurogenesis神经再生 Aggravating Factors加重的因素 (1)On-pump vs. Off-pump Does on-pump versus off-pump make a neurocognitive difference? More recently, Puskas and colleagues found that “After a mean of 7.5 years of follow-up, patients undergoing off-pump coronary artery bypass performed better than those undergoing [on-pump] cardiopulmonary bypass in several neuropsychological domains,”and in a sort of positive-control study, Li et al found that preconditioning with hyperbaric oxygen reduced markers of cerebral injury in patients undergoing on-pump bypass but not in patients having off pump bypass, reasoning that “the protective effects of
您可能关注的文档
最近下载
- 高中地理高三一轮复习 自然地理 地表形态的塑造 大单元学历案 教学设计附双减作业设计(基于新课标教学评一体化).docx VIP
- 中国历代战略思想教程(转发).doc VIP
- Starter Unit1 Hello!26个字母练习题【人教新目标(2024)版七上英语】.docx VIP
- 2025年特色小镇产业发展与社区安全稳定风险评估报告.docx
- 医师定考题库及答案人文.doc
- 消防设施操作员(中级监控)线下实操考核提问要点.pdf VIP
- 苏教版小学三年级科学下册第一单元《植物的一生》每课参考教案汇总(含4个参考教案).doc VIP
- 皖教版五年级上册综合实践活动7.洗衣服(课件).pptx VIP
- 剧本杀完整剧本 致命喷泉(4人封闭).docx VIP
- 2024全国职业院校技能大赛GZ101婴幼儿健康养育照护赛项赛题(技能实操) .docx VIP
文档评论(0)