- 1、本文档共13页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 5、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 6、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 7、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 8、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
钟小凯 法学前沿课程论文
联系方式南昌)北京) EMAIL:kai81@126.com
司法判决如何走出荒谬的困境
--许霆案的法律解释操作分析
钟小凯
摘要:许霆案已渐行远去,但冷静客观地对许霆案的法律解释操作过程进行精致地分析,有利于回答当下“司法判决如何走出荒谬的困境”这一问题。许霆案中对“盗窃”和“盗窃金融机构”的法律解释,其问题并不仅仅在于法律解释方法运用的失当,更在于进行法律解释时的价值判断未曾考虑能够满足社会普遍认可的价值和道德要求。由此,对法律解释操作中的价值判断进行有效规制及合理论证,是司法判决“除谬”的关键所在。为此,有必要引入“商谈、共识”理念进入法律解释领域,将法律论证纳入法律解释的视野。同时,努力构筑法律共同体,形成对法律解释操作实践中价值判断的规制力量。并且,法官在书写司法判决书时应注意充分发挥裁判语言修辞的司法功能,达成司法判决的社会可接受性目标。
关键词:许霆案 司法判决 法律解释 价值判断
。
How to Extricate from the Ridiculous Plight When Conducting Judicial Decision
--Analysis on the Legal Interpretation for Xu, Ting’s Case
Abstract: As Xu, Ting’s case had already happened for relatively a long time; however, sober and objective analysis on the legal interpretation for Xu, Ting’s Case is still of great necessity, because doing so will help to solve the current issue of how to extricate from the ridiculous plight when conducting judicial decision. The legal interpretation for ‘Theft’ and ‘Stealing from Financial Institutions’ in the Xu, Ting’s Case not only lies in the correct adoption of legal interpretation methods; but also lies in the value judgments when conducting legal interpretation, for the values and moral claim, which are recognized universally by the whole society, are not considered in the above stated interpretation process. Hence, carrying out effective regulations and reasonable demonstrations for value judgments is the core to eliminate the ridiculous plight. Considering all these points, it’s necessary to introduce the concepts ‘negotiation and common sense’ into the field of legal interpretation and add legal argumentation into the range of legal interpretation.
Meanwhile, great endeavor should be made to construct the law association, so as to enable value judgments to play their due role in the practice of legal interpretation. Besides, when writing the verdict, the judge should give full play to the judicial function of language’s rhetoric in order to make the judicial d
文档评论(0)