自交亲和性分异研究.pdf

G Model PPEES-25142; No. of Pages 10 ARTICLE IN PRESS Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics xxx (2011) xxx–xxx Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Perspectives in Plant Ecology, Evolution and Systematics j o u r n a l h o m epage: w w w. elsev ier.de/ppees Research article Self-compatibility and plant invasiveness: Comparing species in native and invasive ranges Theodora Petanidou a,∗ , Robert C. Godfree b , Daniel S. Song a,c , Aphrodite Kantsa a , Yoko L. Dupont d , Nickolas M. Waser e,f a Laboratory of Biogeography and Ecology, Department of Geography, University of the Aegean, University Hill, GR-81100 Mytilene, Greece b CSIRO Plant Industry, GPO Box 1600, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia c Fulbright Fellow – Greece, Laboratory of Biogeography and Ecology, Department of Geography, University of the Aegean, University Hill, GR-81100 Mytilene, Greece d Department of Bioscience, Aarhus University, Ny Munkegade, Building 1540, 8000 Aarhus, Denmark e Department of Biology, University of California, Riverside, CA 92521, USA f School of Natural Resources and the Environment, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t Article history: A longstanding hypothesis (“Baker’s rule”) is that plant invasiveness is facilitated by floral self compatibil- Received 1 February 2011 ity rather than self incompatibility. Extending this idea, invasive species whose individuals vary in degree Received in revised form 27 July 2011 of self compatibility within the native range might be self compatible in invading or weedy populations, Accepted 27 August 2011