Trade Mark Dilution in the UK and EU Law: A Critical Analysis of Its Social and Legal Effects on th.docVIP
- 1、本文档共27页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 5、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 6、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 7、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 8、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
Trade Mark Dilution in the UK and EU Law: A Critical Analysis of Its Social and Legal Effects on th.doc
Trade Mark Dilution in the UK and EU Law: A Critical Analysis of Its Social and Legal Effects on th
Introduction:The doctrine of trade mark dilution can be explained as a special form of protection for the well-known trade mark when the circumstance is eligible for certain conditions. The exception is that its relative ground for refusing registration and infringement does not require the likelihood of confusion. In the European Union (EU), to protect the distinctiveness and reputation for a trade mark is deemed as the object and purpose of anti-dilution law. And the UK Trade Mark Act continues and inherits the EU trade mark legal system. Furthermore, the rationale of the concept of dilution is derived form the function of trade mark in the light of Schechter’s theory, where the uniqueness or singularity of the trade mark was highlighted via introducing the advertising or communication function.
D923.43
Despite Schechter holds that such protection for the uniqueness or singularity should be extended to both related and non-related goods, the wording of EU Directive seems only to provide protection on the dissimilar goods or services. While the interpretation of the European Court of Justice (ECJ) expands its literal meaning to incorporate the identical or similar goods or services, however, which constantly suffers from criticisms.
Moreover, there are nearly four significant factors to judge the use of similar marks as dilution: the earlier trade mark with a reputation, three types of injury, establishing a link, as well as without due cause. The injury is made up with tarnishment, blurring and ‘taking unfair advantage’, among which the last one is the main distinction from the United States legislation. It is of danger that excessive loose standards of unfair advantage would cause monopoly and unfair competition. On account of the puzzling theoretical foundation and judicial interpretations, it inevitably gives rise to profound effects on the society an
文档评论(0)