票据空白背书法律问题分析--重庆某钢铁配送有限公司诉某银行杭州市分行票据纠纷一案.pdfVIP

Abstract With the rapid development of Chinas financial industry, the economic life of the Notes application requirements more and more. In practice, because of the convenience of trade or temporarily unable to determine the name of the endorser for various reasons, blank endorsed bill quietly rising to the challenges of the type of bill. Blank endorsed bills due to lack of name of the endorser, and its effectiveness has been endorsed theorists focus of controversy. Notes the legal system of the effectiveness of the provisions on the blank endorsement is mainly reflected in the bill law on article 30 and Supreme Court to hear disputes bills Provisions on Several Issues on article 49. However, these provisions set off theorists blank endorsement effectiveness controversy. Blank endorsed bills in circulation produced a mere delivery of behavior, the behavior effect to be discussed. Whether continuous blank endorsed constitute endorsement interrupt is also necessary to solve this problem. In the first part of this paper introduces the real cases occur in practice,and summarizes the plaintiff will bill blank endorsed to Xus behavior is effective, Xu will blank endorsement only delivered to a industrial company behavior is valid and the defendant can enjoy the right of bill three focus. This second part of the three focus of controversy were analyzed. In the note endorsed in blank on the plaintiff to Xus behavior effectively focus of controversy Analysis in order blank endorsed the concept of the right to supplement endorsed in blank, based on notes from a theoretical analysis of Chinas legal system the provisions endorsed in blank and analyzes recognize blank endorsement valid in practice the practical needs. Xu blank endorsement on the bills delivered to an industrial company simply whether the behavior of the effective focus