腕踝针治疗肩周炎的临床疗效视察.pdf

  1. 1、本文档共35页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
腕踝针治疗肩周炎的临床疗效视察

提 要 目的: 观察腕踝针治疗肩周炎的疗效,并探讨腕踝针治疗本病的作用机理,为临 床治疗肩周炎提供一种新方法。 方法: 将肩周炎患者 60 例随机分为治疗组和对照组,每组均为 30 例。治疗组 选用腕踝针,对照组选用常规针刺。在治疗一次后,一个疗程后及两个疗程后对其 疗效进行比较。 结果: 治疗组与对照组总有效率比较无显著性差异(p0.05),但两个疗程后治疗 组的治愈率、显效率、总有效率均高于对照组。治疗一次后,一个疗程后及两个疗 程后疼痛比较治疗组优于对照组(p<0.05) 。治疗一个疗程后治疗组功能和活动度的 改善情况优于对照组(p<0.05),而在两个疗程后两组的改善情况差别不大(p >0.05) 。 结论: 两组方法对肩周炎的治疗均有效,临床上均可作为治疗肩周炎的方法, 但治疗组的镇痛作用优于对照组。 关键词 肩周炎;腕踝针;减轻疼痛;改善功能和活动度 Clinical Observation on the treatment of periarthritis of shoulder by Wrist Ankle Acupuncture Speciality: Acupuncture and moxibustion Author: Yang Qing Tutor: professor Hou Shuwei Abstract Objective: To observe the the effect of the treatment of periarthritis of shoulder by Wrist Ankle Acupuncture (WAA) and explore the mechanism to provide a new method in clinic. Methods: 60 patients with periarthritis of shoulder were randomly divided into treatment group and control group. Each group has 30 cases. Treatment group selected WAA and the control group used conventional acupuncture. After the first treatment, the first and the second course of treatment the effect were compared. Results: The treatment group and the control group have no significant difference in the total effective rate (p 0.05), but after treatment, the cure rate, markedly effective rate and the total effective rate of the treatment group were higher than that of the control one. The effect of the treatment group is better than that of the control group on reducing pain after the first treatment, the first and the second course of treatment(p 0.05). After a course of treatment, the improvement in activity of the treatment group is better than that of the control group (p0.05), while after the second course of treatment, the two groups have no significant different (p 0.05). Conclusion: Two methods are effec

文档评论(0)

iludyapz + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档