- 1、本文档共9页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 5、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 6、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 7、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 8、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
38例阴式子宫切除术临床效果观察
38例阴式子宫切除术临床效果观察[摘要] 目的 比较阴式子宫切除术与开腹子宫切除术的临床效果。方法 选择2008年12月~2009年12月在我院因各种子宫良性病变而行子宫切除术患者76例作为研究对象,根据入院先后顺序随机分为阴式组38例和开腹组38例,对比观察两组的平均年龄、BMI、子宫孕周大小、子宫病变以及手术时间、术中出血量、手术后的肛门排气时间、住院时间等指标,并应用统计学方法进行处理。结果 与腹式组比较,阴式组的手术时间短、术中出血少、肠功能恢复快、住院时间短,两组比较差异有统计学意义(t=12.46、25.63、7.34、5.37,P<0.01)。术后随访3个月、6个月和12个月,两组术后性生活恢复正常,均大小便正常。且阴式组术后无腹壁切口疼痛,无下腹胀痛及其他不适,术后复查阴道残端愈合良好,无息肉发生,妇检及B超联合检查均未发现有盆腔炎性包块和血肿。结论 阴式子宫切除术与开腹子宫切除术比较具有手术时间短、术中出血少、术后患者恢复快、并发症少、痛苦小、术后住院时间短等优点,值得临床医生广泛应用。
[关键词] 阴式子宫切除术;开腹子宫切除术;随访
[中图分类号] R713.4+2 [文献标识码] B [文章编号] 1673-9701(2011)31-136-02
Clinical Comparative Study on Vaginal Hysterectomy and Abdominal Hysterectomy
WANG Wenli
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, TCM Hospital of Donggang City in Liaoning Province, Donggang 118300, China
[Abstract] Objective To compare vaginal hysterectomy and abdominal hysterectomy in clinical effect. Methods Choose from December 2008 to December 2009 period in our hospital due to a variety of benign uterine disease and hysterectomy 76 patients for the study, according to hospital randomly divided into two groups, the vaginal group 38 cases and open surgery group 38 cases were observed comparing the average age, BMI, gestational age size of the uterus, uterine diseases and surgery of the operative time, blood loss, post-operative anal exhaust time, hospital stay and other indicators and application of statistical methods for processing. Results t test results showed that compared with abdominal, vaginal surgery group a short time, less bleeding, faster recovery of intestinal function, shorter hospital stay, the differences were statistically significant(t=12.46, 25.63, 7.34, 5.37, P<0.01). Patients were followed up 3 months, 6 months and 12 months postoperative sexual life back to normal urine were normal. Vaginal and abdominal incision group were no pain, no abdominal pain and other discomfort, after review of the vaginal stump healed well without polyps occur, gynecological and B-joint examination were found to
文档评论(0)