叁经营者集中审查的实体标准.docVIP

  1. 1、本文档共9页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  5. 5、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  6. 6、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  7. 7、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  8. 8、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
叁经营者集中审查的实体标准

可口可乐收购汇源案法律问题初探 目录 目录 1 Extract 2 壹、可口可乐与汇源并购案回顾 3 贰、关于管辖的讨论 4 2.1 商务部反垄断局对该案进行管辖的法律依据 4 2.2 关于《国务院关于经营者集中申报标准的规定》第三条的讨论 5 2.3 规避管辖的可能性 6 叁、经营者集中审查的实体标准 6 3.1 集中度及相关市场 7 3.2 传导效应 7 3.3 政策及特别事件对反垄断审查的影响 8 肆、风险提示及潜在的解决方案 9 Extract On March 18th this year, Chinas Ministry of Commerce rejected Coca-Colas $2.4 billion dollar bid to acquire the countrys leading pure juice brand, China Huiyuan Juice Group on the grounds it would give the Atlanta-based drinks maker an unfairly dominant position in the market. After researching, the Ministry of Commerce recognizes that such a concentration would have a disadvantageous impact on competition, it said. After the merger, Coca-Cola might use its controlling position in carbonated drinks…in a way that would force consumers to accept higher prices. In a written response to questions, Hong Kong-listed Huiyuan said it respects the Ministry of Commerces comments on the tender offer on Coca-Colas acquisition of Huiyuan Juice. The stock fell nearly 20% on news the deal was dead. The proposed deal was also seen as an important test of Chinas antitrust law passed last August, the Business Week said. Huiyuan has a commanding lead in the 100% fruit juice and juice purée market with about 40% share, it actually saw sales fall in the first half, and it lost market share in the low end market of mixed fruit juices, which account for about 75% of the entire fruit juice segment. On the other hand, Coke, dominant in the carbonated drinks market, is No. 2. This dissertation, aims to analyze the Coke’s case on the basis of regulation on enterprise concentration by Antimonopoly Law, and thus discuss the detail of legal system which regulates enterprise concentration. The dissertation develops this thesis in four parts. The first part recalls the case from the Coke’s announcement of its offer to the disapproval of the deal publicized by Commerce Minister. The second part concerns to the jurisdiction issues. Huiyuan, which was seemed as a domestic

文档评论(0)

zhuwo + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档