2015年8月22日大陆托福考试写作真题和范文解答.docx

2015年8月22日大陆托福考试写作真题和范文解析　　备考托福的小伙伴们注意了，托福真题是你不可缺少的备考利器，前程百利小编给大家整理了刚刚过去的8月22日托福考试写作真题，还有详细的写作思路和优秀范文。小编想要告诉大家的是，托福独立写作再次命中!了解托福考试的题型，有助于我们更好的备考接下来的托福考试，赶紧收藏吧!　　第一部分　　综合写作：?有关“计划烧除”的问题　　阅读：　　1. “计划烧除”对动物有害;　　2. “计划烧除”会造成烟气和二氧化碳污染;　　3. 即使不进行“计划烧除”也会有自然火灾的发生，所以“计划烧除”会浪费财力。　　听力反驳：　　1. 因为有几个月动物是不繁殖的，而且成年动物在遇火时可以成功逃脱，因此“计划烧除”不会对动物造成危害;　　2.“计划烧除”可以让植物吸收二氧化碳;　　3.“计划烧除”会消除可燃物，减少自然火灾的发生。　　综合写作思路：　　1、阅读支持“计划烧除”对动物有害;听力则赞成，动物是不繁殖的，而且成年动物在遇火时可以成功逃脱，因此“计划烧除”不会对动物造成危害。　　2、阅读部分提出“计划烧除”会造成烟气和二氧化碳污染;但是，听力提出“计划烧除”可以让植物吸收二氧化碳。　　3、阅读部分提出，即使不进行“计划烧除”也会有自然火灾的发生，所以“计划烧除”会浪费财力;但是，听力部分则反驳说“计划烧除”会消除可燃物，减少自然火灾的发生。　　范文：　　The lecturer contends that prescribed burns prevent larger forest fires. This directly contradicts the reading passage’s claim that there are more disadvantages than advantages.　　First, in spite of the concerns some people have, only a few animals die from the burns; there is enough time for animals to escape. Moreover, the professor cites the example of Yellowstone National Park, where animals have no difficulties finding new habitats because of the parks huge size. This refutes the reading passage’s claim that forest animals die from prescribed burns and that even if they manage to survive, they have a hard time because of the competition for food in their new territory.　　On top of that, the lecturer says there has been a misunderstanding about the environmental damage of prescribed burns. It is true that prescribed burns produce smoke; however, the amount of smoke is much less than the amount of smoke generated during major forest fires. This rebuts the reading passage’s claim that since many prescribed burns take several days, smoke coming from the burning causes air pollution.　　Finally, prescribed burns are deliberately carried out. The forest officials put a lot of thought and efforts into the burns before they intentionally set a forest on fire; accordingly, it is less feasible that the forest officials would conduct the burns if conditions are not suitable. This contra