R756 中英文对照.pdf

R756/TA743rev In this case, where a B/L was poorly R756/TA743rev structured showing conflicting data, but where an on 一份结构不佳的提单显示了矛盾信 board notation provided clarifying data, was there a 息，但是装船批注提供了澄清的信 discrepancy? Does an on board notation always override 息，这样会构成交单吗？装船批注是 where conflicting data appears in a bill of lading? 否总是优于提单中的矛盾信息？ From UCP600 - UCP 600 sub-article 20 (a) (ii) UCP600 第20 条a 款ii 项 QUERY 咨询 We received a refusal notice from an issuing bank. The discrepancy 我们收到了一份开证行发来的的拒付通 raised by it is as follows: 知，提出如下不符点： + ON BOARD NOTATION NOT SHOWING GOODS LOADED ON + 装船批注没有显示货物已装上船只（船 BOARD THE OCEAN VESSEL (VESSEL L) 舶L ）。 Following are the L/C requirements (among others):Field 44E: Sibu, 以下是信用证的要求（除其他外）： Malaysia Field 44E ：Sibu, Malaysia Field 44F ：Hong Kong - Field 44F: Hong Kong Field 46A ：全套海运提单…… - Field 46A: Full set marine ocean bills of lading 下表是所提交提单的概要： Following is an extract of the presented bill of lading: We, as the nominated bank, argued that the on board notation was 作为指定银行，我们认为装船批注是清楚 very clear and that data appearing as part of an on board notation 的，而且已装船批注内容的效力优于提单 always overrides if there is any conflicting data shown elsewhere on 其他地方的冲突信息。 the bill of lading. The issuing bank reverted to us, asking us to refer to ICC Opinion 开证行回复请我们参考国际商会意见R350 R350, example 3. 中的例3 。 翻译：薛宇航 江西财经大学国贸学院 仅供参