葛剑雄晒账单引发高校图书馆回扣之辩 有硕鼠也有不白之冤管理（Ge Jianxiong Sun bill caused the University Library rebate debate Shuoshu also unrighted wrong management）.doc

葛剑雄晒账单引发高校图书馆回扣之辩 有硕鼠也有不白之冤管理（Ge Jianxiong Sun bill caused the University Library rebate debate Shuoshu also unrighted wrong management） After the two conferences, Ge Jianxiong, a scholar at Fudan University, became the focus of the media again. The reason is that he challenges the University Library unspoken rules, big sun funds bills. The measures for opening up information of institutions of higher learning organized by the Ministry of education shall come into force as of September 1, 2010. As Ge Jianxiong has really let people see the public expectation of transparent dawn. The announcement of the reception has had a bad effect Ge Jianxiong introduced to this reporter, the relevant information from May 2010 began on the website of Fudan University to the whole society announced, the current release is 2009 bill. In the website of Fudan University, the library funds 2009 annual usage table , a list of the financial expenditure, mainly the literature purchase fees, equipment costs, daily administrative service fee, 35 million 42 thousand and 400 yuan in total expenditure in the literature purchasing expenses amounted to 30 million 902 thousand and 900 yuan, while another administrative reception fee of $1 million 98 thousand and 300 619 thousand yuan including containing toilet hygiene items, and official reception fee of 67 thousand and 200 yuan. He said that the release of these bills, did not encounter special pressure, but also said, soon retired, but also not afraid of offending power, influence promotions.. At the beginning of the publication, there are indeed some people who are persuaded to announce that the funds should be appropriate and not appropriate. The entertainment fee should not be announced. This will have a bad effect on other units. But he believes that the most important concern for readers and the public is the cost of management, especially the question of whether to use public funds. Therefore, in accordance with the principle of openness