GRE考试作文的经典范文总结5.pdf

智 课 网 G R E 备 考 资 料 GRE考试作文的经典范文总结5 GRE考试作文的经典范文分类总结。新GRE写作部分的备考过程不 同于GRE考试的其他部分，比如数学部分需要多做习题进行练习，而新 GRE作文需要积累大量的写作素材才能在写作的过程中有东西可写，背 诵一些经典句式对于快速提高自己的GRE写作有很大作用的。 新GRE写作范文第五篇文章 The following appeared as a letter to the editor of a local newspaper. Five years ago, we residents of Morganton voted to keep the publicly owned piece of land known as Scott Woods in a natural, undeveloped state. Our thinking was that, if no shopping centers or houses were built there, Scott Woods would continue to benefit our community as a natural parkland. But now that our town planning committee wants to purchase the land and build a school there, we should reconsider this issue. If the land becomes a school site, no shopping centers or houses can be built there, and substantial acreage would probably be devoted to athletic fields. There would be no better use of land in our community than this, since a large majority of our children participate in sports, and Scott Woods would continue to benefit our community as natural parkland. 原文逻辑顺序：五年前投票决定某地保持原生态==〉原生态可用 来做公园让大家受益==〉现在有人建议盖学校==〉盖学校就要改此地 为操场==〉建操场是唯一能此地还保持原生态的方案(暗含假设为操场 就是原生态)。 This letter to the editor begins by stating the reasons the residents of Morganton voted to keep Scott Woods in an undeveloped state.The letter states that the entire community could benefit from an undeveloped parkland.The residents of the town wanted to ensure that no shopping centers or houses would be built there.This, in turn, would provide everyone in the community with a valuable resource, a natural park.这里是复述题 目的前半部分，即五年前人们的看法以及理由。基本上没有加入任何分 析。 The letter then continues by addressing the issue of building a school on the land.The author reasons that this would also benefit the entire community as a natural parkland since much of the land would be devoted to athletic fields.The author of the letter comes to the conclusion that building a