网站大量收购闲置独家精品文档,联系QQ:2885784924

EVIDENCE OUTLINE - NYU School of Law:证据概述-哥伦比亚大学法学院.doc

EVIDENCE OUTLINE - NYU School of Law:证据概述-哥伦比亚大学法学院.doc

  1. 1、本文档共50页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
EVIDENCE OUTLINE - NYU School of Law:证据概述-哥伦比亚大学法学院

EVIDENCE OUTLINE Prof. Stephen Gillers Fall 2006 1 ? INTRODUCTION Trial Context types of evidence at trial witnesses real evidence – something tangible related to the case demonstrative evidence – not part of the story, but lawyer wishes to show the jury something to demonstrate something about the case (e.g., experiment; picture of intersection) competing stories at trial – two ways stories can compete factual differences differences in inferences drawn from the same facts Policy Overview [values that the evidence rules protect] accuracy rationality – does evidence have a rational relationship to the case? reliability – is the evidence credible? efficiency – see FRE 403 fairness – rules should be party-neutral but note: some rules exclude evidence to one party’s advantage (e.g., evidence that Δ fixed the steps after the accident excluded, b/c we want to encourage Δs to make steps safer) (e.g., Confrontation Clause, guarantees rt of accused in a criminal trial to confront witnesses brought against him) danger of misuse of information one solution: limiting instructions but sometimes we’re so skeptical of jury’s willingness/ability to follow limiting instructions, and the potential harm from the evidence is so grave as to outweigh the modest benefits, so we exclude the evidence protecting rt to jury trial part of the 6th A rt to a jury trial is the rt to an effective jury – jury must be able to do more than just what the judge says; so judge must protect jury prerogative to view evidence and draw conclusions 2 ? RELEVANCE Logical Relevance as defined in the Rules FRE 401 – relevant evidence is evidence having any tendency to make the existence of any fact that is of consequence to the determination of the action more probable or less probable than it would be without the evidence “any tendency” – sets a very low bar “of consequence to the determination of the action” – incorporates the major premise, relational aspect of relevance elements of action lay out the g

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

小教资源库 + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档