网站大量收购独家精品文档,联系QQ:2885784924

2011申论热点剖析人肉有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站案暴露民事立法之不足(Analysis on 2011 hot spots human flesh search case exposed a lack of civil legislation).doc

2011申论热点剖析人肉有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站案暴露民事立法之不足(Analysis on 2011 hot spots human flesh search case exposed a lack of civil legislation).doc

  1. 1、本文档共7页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
2011申论热点剖析人肉有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站案暴露民事立法之不足(Analysis on 2011 hot spots human flesh search case exposed a lack of civil legislation)

2011申论热点剖析人肉有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站案暴露民事立法之不足(Analysis on 2011 hot spots human flesh search case exposed a lack of civil legislation) At the beginning of this year in the media speculation of a raise a Babel of criticism of the human flesh search case, the day before by the Beijing Chaoyang District peoples court. This case is very simple, the affair, his wife hardly wished to live. on the Internet, announced the plaintiff and third photos, and Dutch act. After the students of the deceased collated the relevant information and published them on the Internet, they continued to disclose the relevant information of the plaintiff as an insider. The plaintiff sued the web site of the insider, the Internet website and reprinted the information, and asked for civil compensation. After the court held that the plaintiff did have an extramarital affair, the defendant as insider, in the plaintiffs wife after the disclosure of information, and constantly add relevant information, and published in the internet. Internet Network Management Inc to do not have the obligation to review, and promptly delete the relevant information, undertake infringement of reputation and privacy responsibility, information timely delete the information reproduced Tianya website, is not liable for damages. The decision points of this case can be summarized as follows: firstly, Internet websites can not publish sensitive information, but according to our current approach to network management, website managers are responsible for the supervision, review and delete the obligation, when the victim complained, Internet sites should delete the relevant information in a timely manner, or to assume legal liability; secondly, although the Internet published information belongs to the real information, but because the information belongs to privacy, although the information publishers can prove the authenticity of the information, but should bear tort liability; third, after involving the privacy of individual citizens informati

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

f8r9t5c + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

版权声明书
用户编号:8000054077000003

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档