俄罗斯社会转型理论及立论基础析论（Analysis of Russian social transition theory and its theoretical basis）.doc

俄罗斯社会转型理论及立论基础析论（Analysis of Russian social transition theory and its theoretical basis） Analysis of Russian social transition theory and its theoretical basis -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Release time: 2005-03-10 article source: Chinese Sociological net article author: Zhao Dingdong Abstract: the Russian geographical environment, special things and cultural civilization, unique national character and national consciousness of the social transformation theory must be consistent with its unique national conditions, any copy or the pattern of East westernization is not suitable for it. After three years development and four main schools, the theory of local social transformation in Russia has been developed by sociologists, but its immaturity still restricts the development of Russian society. Key words: Russia; theory of social transformation; nationality The formation of the theory of Russian social transformation originated from the breakthrough of the twenty-seven theories of socialist ownership by the former Soviet Communist Party (CPC) held in 1986. Before the understanding of the socialist ownership theory of the Soviet Union, the long-term existence of area two: one is to improve the degree of one-sided pursuit of public ownership, that ownership becomes more public, the better completely negate the role of individual and private economies, eager to transition to collective ownership by the whole people; the two is the problem of ownership simply for who owns the means of production, ignoring the rich connotation of ownership, thus no form implementation of ownership, use way of the means of production. The twenty-seven major breakthrough of individual economy is the starting point of private ownership and thus be eliminated, starting from the actual needs of individual economic support and allowed to play a complementary role, is that the individual, collective and national ownership should be long-term coex