- 1、本文档共5页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
血液透析患者的尺神经病变研究-newcenturysciencepress
/index.php/gjanp Global Journal of Advanced Nursing Practice,2015,Vol.2,No.1
Study of ulnar neuropathy on hemodialysis patients
Gao Jinzhi, Zheng Baoping, Geng Wenzhen
Hemodialysis Center, Shengli Hospital of Shenli Oilfield, Dongying, Shandong, China
Received: Dec 09, 2014 Accepted: Jan 04, 2015 Published: Mar 31, 2015
DOI:10.14725/gjanp.v2n1.a964 URL:/10.14725/gjanp.v2n1.a964
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use,
distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the effect of elbow positioning on ulnar involvement prevalence among dialysis patients. Materials and
methods: This cross-sectional study started in 02/2013 and completed in 10/2013. 40 hemodialysis patients (elbow flexion and forearm
pronation) and 40 peritoneal patients (upper extremity in free extension) participated in this study. The patients with at least one
symptom or sign of ulnar nerve involvement underwent nerve conduction studies. Nerve conduction velocity (NCV) performed to
confirm the ulnar neuropathy. The intensity of nerve involvement and possibility of associated polyneuropathy were determined
According to the electrophysiological data. Results: The results of clinical examination and nerve electrophysiology diagnosis
confirmed that ulnar neuropathy was present in 11 (27.5%) of 40 hemodialysis patients and in 10 (25%) of 40 peritoneal patients (P =
0.83,). Also, the prevalence of median neuropathy in hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis patients was 14 (35%) and 10 (25%),
respectively (P = 0.33). Both of the differences are not statistically significant. Conclusion: The f
您可能关注的文档
最近下载
- 江苏开放大学行政伦理学综合大作业.doc
- 政治选择性必修2一民事权利与义务.docx
- 启迪幼儿园防汛安全演练方案.doc VIP
- 学校安全工作台账(最完整版).doc VIP
- 第11课 整理信息资源 教案 义务教育人教版信息科技三年级全一册.pdf
- 4.3.2等比数列的前n项和公式(教案)-高中数学人教A版(2019)选择性必修第二册.docx
- 八上必读名著《昆虫记》《红星照耀中国》复习资料.doc VIP
- CQC1143-2019电力储能系统用电池连接电缆认证技术规范.pdf VIP
- 铁路机车车辆驾驶人员(J6类)考前通关必练题及答案.doc VIP
- 幼儿园小班科学活动《小动物找尾巴》课件.pptx
文档评论(0)