网站大量收购独家精品文档,联系QQ:2885784924

analysis of the constitutionality of the men and women admission(分析男性和女性的合宪性).doc

analysis of the constitutionality of the men and women admission(分析男性和女性的合宪性).doc

  1. 1、本文档共21页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
analysis of the constitutionality of the men and women admission(分析男性和女性的合宪性)

Analysis of the constitutionality of the men and women Admission Abstract Recently, the domestic part of the colleges and universities in the division college admission scores of men and women ‘with the test’, sparked great debate the community fair entrance and gender discrimination. From the perspective of the protection of citizens’ equal right to education, first analyzes a certain extent, discriminatory reasonable, and the purpose and means reasonable standard, and then pursuant to the constitutionality of the gender-specific enrollment, combined with Review of ‘corrective movement’ against ‘reverse discrimination’ put forward reasonable proposals for such corrective behavior. Paper Keywords equal right to education discrimination on the ground of discriminatory constitutional review I. Introduction China has a long history as the birthplace of the imperial examination system, admitted to examination in the form of personnel practices, and to a certain extent, this reflects the ‘excellent learning Chinese official,’ the traditional concept. But the imperial examination system is not the focus of this article, we need to see that, since the date of birth of the imperial examination system, just pay attention to the results of the candidates, no other inspection standards. Confucius have expressed the ‘No Child Left Behind’ education thought. From a certain level, which reflects the traditional educational philosophy on the importance of formal justice. But this does not mean that the ancient philosophy of education ahead of superiority, maturing in the rule of law, the legal protection of citizens the right to education is not merely in the form of justice stage. Modern constitution requires both the era of reaction and freedom to adapt the form of equality, to prevent a mere substantive equality sacrificing efficiency; also asked to recognize and respect and try to reduce or even eliminate the substantive equality of inequality responsibility.

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

jiupshaieuk12 + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

版权声明书
用户编号:6212135231000003

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档