比喻、比拟和拟人的区别（The difference between metaphor, analogy and personification）.doc

比喻、比拟和拟人的区别（The difference between metaphor, analogy and personification） The difference between metaphor, analogy and personification Supplementary data What is the difference between metaphor, analogy and personification? In the junior middle school textbooks we had been told, but many students are not clear, the plausible answer, so many points. A brief introduction is given to metaphor, analogy and personification. Metaphor (1) a metaphor is a rhetorical device in which something is said to be compared with something that has a similar point in order to make it more vivid. It is often said the metaphor analogy, namely two kinds of different things in nature, have similarities, use one thing to another. For example, between things is to focus on a B Yu, Yu, and is a master from a relationship. (two) structure: generally, it consists of three parts, namely, ontology (figurative things), metaphor (figurative things) and figurative words (figurative words of figurative relation). (three) conditions: A and B must be essentially different things, or else they can not form a metaphor. A sentence is not a metaphor, can not see whether there is no word, between a and B must have similarities. (four) species: 1, simile. The body metaphor appears, and the middle uses the figurative words like, like, like, like, like, like, and so on. Sometimes there is like, same and so on. The typical form is like a simile: B. For example: the leaves are very high, like the skirts of the graceful girl dancers. 2, metaphor, also known as metaphor. The ontological metaphor appears, and the middle word is yes, Cheng, equal, Cheng, Cheng, and so on, and sometimes metaphor does not need words. The typical form of metaphor is: A, B. For example, most of the time, cloud four, cengluan stacked cockroach. 3, metaphor. Without ontology, a direct account of the metaphor. As a typical form of Metonymy: a generation of B. For example: a sword is not in the palm, but a friend must be many. (Cao Zhi). T