网站大量收购闲置独家精品文档,联系QQ:2885784924

第12讲 最高限价(微观经济学-郑州大学,王文玉).ppt

第12讲 最高限价(微观经济学-郑州大学,王文玉).ppt

  1. 1、本文档共13页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
第12讲 最高限价(微观经济学-郑州大学,王文玉)

第12讲 最高限价 一、WHAT IS SEEN, WHAT IS NOT SEEN 在自由市场中,每个人都既是生产者,又是消费者。但是,在不同时刻,他有时是生产者,有时是消费者,即作为生产者和消费者的身份是分离的。 这使得他容易患精神分裂症。作为消费者,他赞成不利于生产者的政策,如限价;作为生产者,他赞成保护生产者的政策,如关税和补贴等。 经济学家的使命是传播政策的经济学见解,帮助人们克服上述精神分裂症,更要揭穿一些经济诡辩。 正如经济学家Hazlitt在Economics in One Lesson 中生动地描述的那样: Economics is haunted by more fallacies than any other study known to man. This is no accident. The inherent difficulties of the subject would be great enough in any case, but they are multiplied a thousand fold by a factor that is insignificant in, say, physics, mathematics or medicine—the special pleading of selfish interests. While every group has certain economics interests identical with those of all groups, every group has also, as we shall see, interests antagonistic to those of all other groups. While certain public policies would in the long run benefit everybody, other policies would benefit one group only at the expense of all other groups. The group that would benefit by such policies, having such a direct interest in them, will argue for them plausibly and persistently. It will hire the best buyable minds to devote their whole time to presenting its case. And it will finally either convince the general public that its case is sound, or so befuddle it that clear thinking on the subject becomes next to impossible. In addition to these endless pleadings of self-interest, there is a second main factor that spawns new economic fallacies every day. This is the persistent tendency of men to see only the immediate effects of a given policy, or its effects only on a special group and to neglect to inquire what the long-run effects of that policy will be not only on that special group but on all groups. It is the fallacy of overlooking secondary consequences. In this lies almost the whole difference between good economics and bad. The bad economist sees only what immediately strikes the eye; the good economist also looks beyond. The bad economist sees only the direct consequences of a proposed co

文档评论(0)

wyjy + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档