- 1、本文档共12页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 5、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 6、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 7、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 8、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
英语报刊阅读过程稿
But only 7 percent of Americans we surveyed ranked homeownership as their first or second definition of the American dream. Why the discrepancy(矛盾,差异)?Owning real estate is important to some Americans, but not as important——or as financially rewarding——as we’re led to believe. Federal support of homeownership greatly overvalues its meaning in American life. Through tax breaks and guarantees, the government boosted homeownership to its peak in 2004, when 69 percent of American households owned homes. Subsides for homeownership, including the mortgage(抵押借款,按揭) interest deduction, reached $230 billion in 2009, according to the Congressional Budget Office(国会预算局). Meanwhile, only $60 billion in tax breaks(减税优惠) and spending programs aided renters. The results of this real estate spending spree(无节制的狂热行为) According to the Federal Reserve(美国联邦储备局), American real estate lost more than $6 trillion in value, or almost 30 percent, between 2006 and 2010. One in five American homeowners is underwater(价值缩水的,资不抵债的), owing more on a mortgage than what the home is worth. Those who profit most from homeownership are far and away (by a great deal or amount; very much) the largest source of political campaign contributions. Insurance companies, securities and investment firms, real estate interests, and commercial banks gave more than $100 million to federal candidates and parties in 2011, according to the Center for Responsive Politics(政治反应中心). The National Association of Realtors (NAR,美国房地产经纪人协会) alone gave more than $950,000——more than Morgan Stanley(摩根·史丹利投资公司), Citigroup (or Citi,花旗集团), or Ernst Young(安永会计师事务所). Homeownership is more important to special interests than it is to most Americans, who, according to our research, care more about “a good job,”“ the pursuit of happiness” and “freedom.” Why isn’t homeownership ranked first or second by most people in the American dream? * In June, a New York Times(《纽约时报》)-CBS News(美国哥伦比亚广播公司新闻频道) poll found that almost 90 percent
您可能关注的文档
最近下载
- 中国高尔夫差点系统会员入会申请书.doc
- 江苏国泰(002091)公司2023年财务分析研究报告.doc
- 2024执业药师继续教育药物分析(3)参考答案.docx
- DB11T 383-2023 建筑工程施工现场安全资料管理规程.docx
- 总体国家安全观授课.pptx VIP
- 一种聚4-甲基-1-戊烯中空纤维膜的制备方法.pdf VIP
- DB11T 1832.2-2023 建筑工程施工工艺规程 第2部分:防水工程.docx
- 普外科麻醉科运用PDCA循环提高患者术后自控镇痛有效率QCC品管圈成果汇报书.docx
- 海信BCD-203FH电冰箱使用说明书.pdf
- 哈工大尹海洁社会统计学(第2版)课后习题答案.docx
文档评论(0)