中国政法大学论文-南海断续线的法律地位.pdf

论文编号： 中国政法大学 本科生毕业论文 南海断续线的法律地位 南海断续线的法律地位 [摘要] 2013年 11月32 日中国政府宣布划设东海防空识别区,并称将来中国会在 “适当的时当 宣布划设类似的防空识别区,可能涵盖南海。中国是否有权在南海划定防空识别区,首先要明 确的是中国对南海的合法主权。关于南海断续线,周边国家和美国提出了质疑。在学术界对断 续线的性质也有诸多不同的说法，主要有4种主张：国界线说、历史水域说、历史权利说、 岛屿归属说。 本文主要采取文献研究法，通过各种专业数据库和中外国际公法方面的著作查找相关资 料，通过借鉴各种传统理论和相关研究成果来论证断续线的性质，本文主要分析4种学说的 相同与不同之处从历史角度和法律角度来论证断续线的性质，本文比较支持岛屿归属的说法。 [关键词] 南海 断续线 法律地位 1 TheApplicationofLawRulesinForeign-relatedTourism Infringements [Abstract] The government of China declared on November 23th in 2013 that the air defense identificationzoneintheEast Seawas established,andthe similarairdefenseidentificationzones which perhaps coverthe SouthChina Seawill be established in aproper time Clarifying China’s legitimatesovereigntiesto SouthChinaSeaisthepremiseofdeterminingwhetherChinaisentitled toestablishtheairdefenseidentificationzoneintheSouthSea SurroundingcountriesandAmerica putforwardsomedisagreementsaboutthedottedlineintheSouthSea Andsomescholarscomeup with some different theories about the legal status of the dotted line in the South Sea, such as national boundary theory, historical waters theory, historical rights theory and island’s ownership theory To clarify the legal status of the South Sea dotted line, the author searches quantities of relevant information from professional date bases, treatises on international law and relevant research achievements Then the author analyzes four traditional theories by comparing their similaritiesanddifferencesanddemonstratesthe statusofthe SouthSeadottedlinefromhistorical perspectiveandlegalperspective Intheconclusion,theauthorisinfavoroftheisland’sownership theory [KeyWord]SouthChinaSea thedottedline legalstatus 1 中