- 1、本文档共7页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
中文接纳与行动问卷第二版(AAQ-II) 与认知融合问卷(CFQ)在回族 和哈萨克族青少年中的信效度检验
Advances in Psychology 心理学进展, 2015, 5(11), 695-701
Published Online November 2015 in Hans. /journal/ap
/10.12677/ap.2015.511090
Reliability and Validity in the
Chinese Version of the Acceptance
and Action Questionnaire-2nd
Edition (AAQ-II) and the Chinese
Version of Cognitive Fusion
Questionnaire (CFQ) in Hui
and Kazak Adolescents
1 2* 3* 4* 4* 4* 5*
Xiaolong Wang , Jing Cao , Jing An , Wanbing Ding , Yulan Suo , Hua Su , Yan Li ,
Zhuohong Zhu2#, Yonglong Tang1#
1
School of Psychology, Southwest University, Chongqing
2
Key Laboratory of Mental Health, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing
3
Changji University, Changji Xinjiang
4
High School of Hui, Changji Xinjiang
5
Youth Activity Center, Yining Xinjiang
th rd th
Received: Nov. 4 , 2015; accepted: Nov. 23 , 2015; published: Nov. 25 , 2015
Copyright © 2015 by authors and Hans Publishers Inc.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY).
/licenses/by/4.0/
Abstract
Objective: To examine the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Acceptance and Action
Questionnaire-2nd Edition (AAQ-II) and the Cognitive Fusion Questionnaire (CFQ) and to offer a
measurement tool in studies of experiential avoidance and cognitive fusion. Methods: By conven-
ience sampling method, two samples of Kazakh high school students (n1 = 248) and Hui college
students (n2 = 234) were selected and assessed with the AAQ-II and CFQ for item analysis, internal
文档评论(0)