英文辩论赛稿.doc.doc

正方一辩陈词 Gifted children are supposed to be the ones who excel in thinking, remembering, observing and etc.And We believed that gifted children should be educated separately. 1 Firstly, we believed that seperated education offers gifted children a chance to get more challenging tasks. We all know Vygotsky’s zone of proximal development theroy. It indicates that everyone has the possibility of further development and we need to push children to achieve their possible development. How could gifted children achieve their proximal development learning something they already know? If we don’t give gifted children seperated education, we deprive them of chance to proximal development.(TAO Q: Can I interpret what you just said in this way: normal children don’t need challenging tasks? They should just some content within their reach ?A: No, I don’t mean to say that. Normal children also need challenging tasks to get further development. When we say some material is Chanllenging, we say it is challenging for some body. For example, addition is something challenging for the first grade, but it is not ecessary to learn for the forth grade. ) We have examples to illustrate this. Edision was labeled as changeling because he always asked some question beyond his age. 2Secondly, we believed that communication will be definitely smoother among people who are at the same level. We mean to say that gifted children will develop a good relationship with their classmates who think in the same level. 3Thirdly, we believed that separated education makes practical sense. It will save a lot of time and efforts for the teachers and the schoolmaster. As we all know individualized education is always been advocated and there is plenty of proof that it is right to do so. How could a teacher conduct his individualized education in a class where children are quite different in their way of thinking, interest and level of understanding? Separated education, we can’t say completely solve this di