Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine – Levels of Evidence (March 2009).docx

Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine – Levels of Evidence (March 2009).docx

  1. 1、本文档共5页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine – Levels of Evidence (March 2009)

Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine – Levels of Evidence (March 2009)What are we to do when the irresistible force of the need to offer clinical advice meets with the immovable object of flawed evidence? All we can do is our best: give the advice, but alert the advisees to the flaws in the evidence on which it is based.The CEBM ‘Levels of Evidence 1′ document sets out one approach to systematising this process for different question types.(For definitions of terms used see our glossary)LevelTherapy / Prevention, Aetiology / HarmPrognosisDiagnosisDifferential diagnosis / symptom prevalence studyEconomic and decision analyses1aSR (with homogeneity*) of RCTsSR (with homogeneity*) of inception cohort studies; CDR”? validated in different populationsSR (with homogeneity*) of Level 1 diagnostic studies; CDR”? with 1b studies from different clinical centresSR (with homogeneity*) of prospective cohort studiesSR (with homogeneity*) of Level 1 economic studies1bIndividual RCT (with narrow Confidence Interval”?)Individual inception cohort study with 80% follow-up; CDR”? validated in a single populationValidating** cohort study with good”?”?”? reference standards; or CDR”? tested within one clinical centreProspective cohort study with good follow-up****Analysis based on clinically sensible costs or alternatives; systematic review(s) of the evidence; and including multi-way sensitivity analyses1cAll or none§All or none case-seriesAbsolute SpPins and SnNouts”?“All or none case-seriesAbsolute better-value or worse-value analyses ”?”?”?“2aSR (with homogeneity*) of cohort studiesSR (with homogeneity*) of either retrospective cohort studies or untreated control groups in RCTsSR (with homogeneity*) of Level 2 diagnostic studiesSR (with homogeneity*) of 2b and better studiesSR (with homogeneity*) of Level 2 economic studies2bIndividual cohort study (including low quality RCT; e.g., 80% follow-up)Retrospective cohort study or follow-up of untreated control patients in an RCT; Der

文档评论(0)

xcs88858 + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

版权声明书
用户编号:8130065136000003

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档