RC mia的OG12 原文.doc

7.4 Sample Questions 红色-main idea;黄色-supporting idea;蓝色inference;绿色application;青色logical structure；粉色evaluation.深蓝色tone.态度词灰色：选项中的错误；ND: not discussed; NM: not mentioned. OP: 相反；IR：无关；黑体字是阅读和判断选项的点，色字体是解释。出现的行数以OG中的行数为准。 要做的事情：1、分析文章的套路类型、题材 2、写出文章的逻辑框架 3、每一段的作用是什么 4、段与段之间的联系，文章是怎么串在一起的 5、哪些词语（如态度、举例作用）要重点关注1、 Eco-efficiency (measures to minimize environmental impact through the reduction or elimination of waste from production processes) has become a goal for companies worldwide, with many realizing significant (5) cost savings from such innovations. （旧观点） Peter Senge and Goran Carstedt see this development as laudable but suggest that simply adopting eco-efficiency innovations could actually worsen environmental stresses in the future. （提出新观点）{Such innovations reduce (10) production waste but do not alter the number of products manufactured nor the waste generated from their use and discard; indeed, most companies invest in eco-efficiency improvements in order to increase profits and growth. Moreover（递进副词，说明前面还有与这一点并列的内容）, there is no (15) guarantee that increased economic growth from eco-efficiency will come in similarly eco-efficient ways, since in today’s global markets, greater profits may be turned into investment capital that could easily be reinvested in old-style eco-inefficient industries. Even（新观点的支持论点第二点的进一步让步、引申） (20) a vastly more eco-efficient industrial system could, were it to grow much larger, generate more total waste and destroy more habitat and species than would a smaller, less eco-efficient economy. 支持新观点的论点也就是接受旧观点的几个后果}Senge and Carstedt argue that（重申新观点，提出建议）to preserve the global (25) environment and sustain economic growth, businesses must develop a new systemic approach that reduces total material use and total accumulated waste. Focusing exclusively on eco-efficiency, which offers a compelling business case according to (30) established thinking, may distract companies from pursuing radically different products and business m