- 1、本文档共11页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
四级深度阅读试题精选(5套10篇)
深度阅读试题精选——五套 共十篇
第一套
Section B
Directions: There are 2 passages in this section. Each passage is followed by some questions or unfinished statements. For each of them there are four choices marked A) , B) , C) , and D) .You should decide on the best choice and mark the corresponding letter on Answer Sheet 2 with a single line through the centre.
Passage One
Questions 57 to 61 are based on the following passage.
选材题源 New Scientist 《新科学家》
选材仿真度 ★★★★
仿真设题 57题仿照2008年6月第57题设题;58题仿照2010年12月第58题设题;
59题仿照2006年6月第59题设题;60题仿照2009年6月第61题设题;
61题仿照2008年6月第66题设题。
Do you believe that some principles are sacred? If you do, it could make you a hawk rather than a dove in time of war. A new study suggests that most societies have “sacred rules” for which their people would die rather than compromise. If people perceive one such rule to have been violated, they may feel morally obliged to retaliate(报复) against the wrongdoers—even if the retaliation does more harm than good.
Psychologist Jeremy Ginges and anthropologist Scott Atran presented 50 US students with a hypothetical crisis in which a foreign country captured 100 US citizens and was expected to kill them. Half the volunteers were asked to consider a military response to the kidnapping, and half a diplomatic response.
When told that their action would result in all hostages(人质) being saved, both groups approved the plan presented to them. Told that one hostage would die, however, most “diplomats” became reluctant to approve the proposed response.“Militarists” had no such doubts. In fact, the most common response suggested that they would support military action even if 99 hostages died as a consequence. Similar results were found in studies of Nigerian and Palestinian volunteers.揚eople are much more willing to accept grievous losses during violence than in diplomacy,?Atran says.揑t doesn ’t make any sense.?Atran has a theory to explain the unusual results. The diplomats considered the costs and benefits of their decision
文档评论(0)