网站大量收购闲置独家精品文档,联系QQ:2885784924

【精选】§2.1人力资本、实物资本与中美两国的产出差别§2.1人力资本、实物资本与中美两国的产出差别.pdf

【精选】§2.1人力资本、实物资本与中美两国的产出差别§2.1人力资本、实物资本与中美两国的产出差别.pdf

  1. 1、本文档共11页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
【精选】§2.1人力资本、实物资本与中美两国的产出差别§2.1人力资本、实物资本与中美两国的产出差别

—— 1981—2005 52 1981—2005 52 0.456Mankiw 1992 10 17 GDP Human Capital, Physical Capital and Country Output Variations between China and United States: an Empirical Test of Human Capital Model Using Panel Data from 52 Countries in the Year 1981-2005 ZHANG Yan (Peking University, 100871) XU Yunxiao (Peking University, 100871) WANG Zhiqiang (Peking University, 100871) Abstract: This paper is the first attempt to study the output variation between China and the United States from the perspective of human capital. Based from the human capital model, using the macroeconomic panel data of 52 countries during the year 1981-2005, through the ordinary least square method, this study evaluates that the proportion of human capital in the elasticity of saving rate to the output is about 0.456, which could not only be viewed as an extensional research of American economists Mankiw (1992), but also a new comprehensive and scientific evaluation. This paper finds that, in the human capital model, the 2.5 times differences of Sino-US saving rate could explain about the 10 times differences of output per capita, and the increase of saving rate of human capital could significantly improve the output per capita. In the model which only contains physical capital, however, the same Sino-US saving rate of physical capital 1 could only result in the same outp

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

tazhiq2 + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档