雅思大作文范文：学生给老师评语.doc

Many people argued that in order to improve educational quality continuously, students are encouraged to make comments or even criticism on teachers. Others think the respect and discipline in the classroom will disappear. Which opinion do you prefer? participation Teacher appraisal is not a new instrument in improving teaching performance or developing teacher training. However, when it comes to inviting the input of students and seeking their comments on teachers’ performance, there is disagreement. Some people object to this practice, saying that it leads to the loss of respect and discipline. In my opinion, students’ participation in teacher appraisal is definitely helpful, but it should be administered properly. When it comes to +n./doing, there is an ongoing debate. A strong argument for using student ratings to evaluate teachers is that students’ judgement is reliable and impartial. Because of their ongoing interaction with teachers throughout the semester, students have the authority to measure the performance and competence of a teacher, with the knowledge they have obtained from learning and the stance/attitude they have adopted toward the subject taught. A critical analysis of students’ feedback enables teachers to enhance their competence and adjust teaching aims and methods for better attainment of students’ learning objectives. Students are also concerned about whether the teacher is fully committed to his or her job. The value of a teacher is determined as much by competence as by commitment. The school can therefore assess the performance of a teacher by collecting students’ feedback on some observable facts, such as a teacher’s punctuality and the legibility of his or her writing on the board. Teachers who perform poorly are advised to reflect deeply on their teaching practice, the drawbacks in particular, which is the key to the improvement of their performance. Despite those overt advantages of encouraging students’ input, analysis of their input