- 1、本文档共7页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
法律翻译课堂--Aiding and Abetting
法律翻译课堂--Aiding and Abetting泛瑞翻译Aiding and AbettingTo assist or facilitate the commission of a crime, or to promote its accomplishment. ? Aiding and abetting is a crime in most jurisdictions. ?— Also termed aid or abet; criminal facilitation; counsel and procure. — aider and abettor, nAiding-and-abetting liabilityCivil or, more typically, criminal liability imposed on one who assists in or facilitates the commission of an act that results in harm or loss, or who otherwise promotes the acts accomplishment. See AID AND ABET. Cf. causer liability.Aiding and Abetting 帮助和教唆指引诱、唆使、鼓励或促成他人实施犯罪的行为。在美国,教唆他人实施任何犯罪都可以构成教唆罪,且只要有了教唆行为就构成既遂犯罪,而不要求被教唆者实施了教唆的罪。在英国,以前只有帮助和教唆他人实施重罪才构成二级主犯(a principal in the second degree),1967年以后帮助和教唆他人实施任何犯罪均以主犯论处。Latest Case Opinion in U.S.Ritchie Capital Mgmt. v. GECCAreas of Law: Civil Procedure?Ritchie filed suit against GECC for civil conspiracy to commit fraud, for aiding and abetting fraud, and for negligence in connection with Thomas Petters Ponzi scheme.?The district court granted GECCs motion to dismiss based on Ritchies lack of standing. The district court reasoned that Ritchie lacked standing to bring the conspiracy and aiding and abetting claims because the causes of action were the exclusive property of the Petters Estate and, in the alternative, that Ritchie failed to state a claim because Ritchie failed to plead proximate cause for the aiding and abetting claim and failed to plead an “overt act” for the civil conspiracy claim.?The court concluded that Ritchie lacks standing to assert its claims because Ritchie has not alleged a particularized injury.?The court adopted the district courts opinion and order. Accordingly, the court affirmed the judgment.
您可能关注的文档
最近下载
- 风管及桥架穿墙、穿板封堵施工方案.docx VIP
- 8.2 文化交流与文化交融(2023必威体育精装版版)高二政治课件(统编版必修4).pptx VIP
- 上海市六年级(下)数学同步讲义 第16讲 线段的相等与和、差、倍.doc VIP
- 上海市六年级(下)数学同步讲义 第17讲 角.doc VIP
- 人教精通版六年级英语上册 期末冲刺复习——句型专项突破卷【含答案】.doc
- 主题班会:勤奋学习主题班会ppt课件.pptx
- 人教精通版六年级英语上册 期末冲刺复习——词汇专项突破卷【含答案】.doc
- 《乡土中国》整本书阅读第12篇:血缘和地缘课件 统编版高中语文必修上册.pptx
- 第1~18届历届全国华罗庚金杯少年数学邀请赛真题全集 (1).pdf
- 卫生院全套规章制度汇编.pdf
文档评论(0)