法律翻译课堂--Aiding and Abetting.docx

  1. 1、本文档共7页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
法律翻译课堂--Aiding and Abetting

法律翻译课堂--Aiding and Abetting泛瑞翻译Aiding and AbettingTo assist or facilitate the commission of a crime, or to promote its accomplishment. ? Aiding and abetting is a crime in most jurisdictions. ?— Also termed aid or abet; criminal facilitation; counsel and procure. — aider and abettor, nAiding-and-abetting liabilityCivil or, more typically, criminal liability imposed on one who assists in or facilitates the commission of an act that results in harm or loss, or who otherwise promotes the acts accomplishment. See AID AND ABET. Cf. causer liability.Aiding and Abetting 帮助和教唆指引诱、唆使、鼓励或促成他人实施犯罪的行为。在美国,教唆他人实施任何犯罪都可以构成教唆罪,且只要有了教唆行为就构成既遂犯罪,而不要求被教唆者实施了教唆的罪。在英国,以前只有帮助和教唆他人实施重罪才构成二级主犯(a principal in the second degree),1967年以后帮助和教唆他人实施任何犯罪均以主犯论处。Latest Case Opinion in U.S.Ritchie Capital Mgmt. v. GECCAreas of Law: Civil Procedure?Ritchie filed suit against GECC for civil conspiracy to commit fraud, for aiding and abetting fraud, and for negligence in connection with Thomas Petters Ponzi scheme.?The district court granted GECCs motion to dismiss based on Ritchies lack of standing. The district court reasoned that Ritchie lacked standing to bring the conspiracy and aiding and abetting claims because the causes of action were the exclusive property of the Petters Estate and, in the alternative, that Ritchie failed to state a claim because Ritchie failed to plead proximate cause for the aiding and abetting claim and failed to plead an “overt act” for the civil conspiracy claim.?The court concluded that Ritchie lacks standing to assert its claims because Ritchie has not alleged a particularized injury.?The court adopted the district courts opinion and order. Accordingly, the court affirmed the judgment.

文档评论(0)

xcs88858 + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

版权声明书
用户编号:8130065136000003

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档