阅读理解 外交12.docx

一篇文章的详细总结，逻辑简图，小安阅读法的疑惑，望大家指导~~小安NN在经验中提到：“进行横向总结：1、根据细节题的题目和正确答案把考点在原文中全部画出来。然后看细节题的考法，总结：主要的无外乎取非和关键字替换2、把所有main idea题看一遍，看其对文章意思的表述方法：有套路，且不走极端3、把所有结构题看一遍，看其表述方法4、把态度题看一遍（题目太少，可以再看看gre年代题）5、最关键的题information题。没什么好方法，锻炼看题目时的记忆力，还有主要从段落意思上看”但是，小安光指出了上述指出的五种题型，问题是，若看不出究竟是哪种题型，怎么用小安阅读法进行总结？对于哪些非上述题型的题，我们该怎么办？（固然，上述题型所占比例很大，但其他的题型也不能不管呀）可是，有些题目，可能是由于水平的原因，看不出来是什么题型，或者是本来就不是上述五种规范的题型，我们在实施小安阅读法总结的时候怎么办？比如下面2、4两道题，我就不知道是什么题型。文章：Passage 11 (11/63)Archaeology as a profession faces two major problems. First, it is the poorest of the poor. Only paltry sums are available for excavating and even less is available for publishing the results and preserving the sites once excavated. Yet archaeologists deal with priceless objects every day. Second, there is the problem of illegal excavation, resulting in museum-quality pieces being sold to the highest bidder.I would like to make an outrageous (exceeding the limits of what is usual) suggestion that would at one stroke (at one stroke: adv.一笔, 一举) provide funds for archaeology and reduce the amount of illegal digging. I would propose that scientific archeological expeditions and governmental authorities sell excavated artifacts on the open market. Such sales would provide substantial funds for the excavation and preservation of archaeological sites and the publication of results. At the same time, they would break the illegal excavator’s grip on the market, thereby decreasing the inducement to engage in illegal activities.You might object that professionals excavate to acquire knowledge, not money. Moreover, ancient artifacts are part of our global cultural heritage, which should be available for all to appreciate, not sold to the highest bidder. I agree. Sell nothing that has unique artistic merit or scientific value. But, you might reply everything that comes out of the ground has scientific value. Here we part company. Theoretically, you may be correct in claiming that every artifact has potential scientific value. Practically, yo