- 1、本文档共67页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
冯友兰中国哲学简史中英文版之第十一章后期墨家
CHAPTER 11 THE LATER MOHISTS 第十一章 后期墨家IN the Mo-Tzu, there are six chapters (chs. 40-45) which differ in character from the other chapters and possess a special logical interest. Of these, chapters forty to forty-one are titled Canons and consist of definitions of logical, moral, mathematical, and scientific ideas. Chapters forty -two to forty-three are titled Expositions of the Canons, and consist of explanations of the definitions contained in the preceding two chapters. And chapters forty-four and forty-five are titled Major Illustrations and Minor Illustrations respectively. In them, several topics of logical interest are discussed. The general purpose of all six chapters is to uphold the Mohist point of view and refute, in a logical way, the arguments of the School of Names. The chapters as a whole are usually known as the Mohist Canons.《墨子》中有六篇:《经上》、《经下》、《经说上》、《经说下》、《大取》、《小取》,与其他各篇性质不同,特别有逻辑学的价值。《经上》、《经下》都是逻辑、道德、数学和自然科学的定义。《经说上》、《经说下》是对前两篇中定义的解释。《大取》、《小取》讨论了若干逻辑问题。所有这六篇有一个总的目的,就是通过逻辑方式,树立墨家的观点,反驳名家的辩论。这六篇合在一起,通常叫做“墨经”。In the last chapter we have seen that in the Chi Wu Lun, Chuang Tzu discussed two levels of knowledge. On the first level, he proved the relativity of things and reached the same conclusion as that of Hui Shih. But on the second level, he went beyond him. On the first level, he agreed with the School of Names and criticized common sense from a higher point of view. On the second level, however, he in turn criticized the School of Names from a still higher point of view. Thus the Taoists refuted the arguments of the School of Names as well, but the arguments they used are, logically speaking, on a higher level than those of the School of Names. Both their arguments and those of the School of Names require an effort of reflective thinking to be understood. Both run counter to the ordinary canons of common sense.前一章讲过,庄子在《齐物论》里讨论了两个层次的知识。在第一个层次上,他证明了事物的相对性,达到了与惠施的结论相同的结论。但是在第二个层次上,他就超越了惠施。在第一个层次上,他同意于名家,从更高一层的观点批评了常识。但是在第二个层次上,他又转过来从再高一层的观
文档评论(0)