网站大量收购独家精品文档,联系QQ:2885784924

选择Trapeze的八个理由.ppt

  1. 1、本文档共28页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、有哪些信誉好的足球投注网站(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
选择Trapeze的八个理由

* * * * * * Let’s look at voice. So what’s the problem with voice in a centralized architecture? Well, all the traffic goes through the central controller. This increases latency, and yields an architecture that’s not very flexible for dealing with voice. Voice is inherently a peer-to-peer application. The way SIP or the way VoIP works, a handset talks directly to another handset when a call is established. Or a handset talks directly to a PBX if it’s trying to interconnect to the PSTN. Voice is inherently an application that requires low latency. So it’s highly desirable to take the shortest possible path through the network and touch the minimum number of devices that you need to touch. But a centralized architecture touches a whole lot of boxes it doesn’t need to touch because it forwards everything through a centralized wireless LAN switch. Many times, that switch is not very close to those APs. For example, in a campus network, with switches in one building and APs throughout three buildings on campus, traffic could be coming all the way across campus, back into the central building, back across, and back to the building where the call started. Sometimes they’re hosted across wide area links. And if there’s high latency just in the wired infrastructure between the boxes, that adds to the problem. So how does Smart Mobile deal with voice? Well, Smart Mobile says, “This is a peer-to-peer application. It needs low latency. Let’s push all of the traffic forwarding to the access point.” In this way, traffic flows across the core network once, takes the shortest possible path through that network, takes the lowest possible latency path through that network. It’s an architecture that looks exactly like SIP. So you could replace that WLAN controller with a box that says SIP gateway. And the picture would look the same. Because the control and management traffic for a SIP handset would go to the SIP gateway. But the calls would go handset to hand

文档评论(0)

zhuwenmeijiale + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

版权声明书
用户编号:7065136142000003

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档