“官话和合译本”与“文理和合译本”的“处境化”方式比较.pdfVIP

Journal of Sino- Western Communications, Volume 2, Issue 1 (July, 2010) “官话和合译本”与“文理和合译本”的 “处境化”方式比较 The Comparison of the Different Contextualization Manners Expressed in the Mandarin Union Version and Wenli Union Version 马红莉 Ma, Hongli 华东师范大学中文系 Dept. of Chinese Language Literature East China Normal University, Shanghai, China 154 Journal of Sino- Western Communications, Volume 2, Issue 1 (July, 2010) 摘要：“处境化”是汉语基督教神学一直关注的重要话题。圣经的翻译活动涉及到基督教 与本土文化间的冲突、适应、融合或消解等一系列问题，因此考察圣经翻译的过程，可 以为基督教“处境化”研究提供一个具体可参的样本。“官话和合译本”与“文理和合译 本”出版于1919 年，二者遭遇了截然不同的命运，这在很大程度上与二者不同的“处境 化”方式有关。“官话和合译本”所选择的以“涵化”为主的“处境化”方式，使其较少 依赖于汉语已有的表达范式，从而在面对文化处境的变化时充满了弹性，并积极参与了 塑造、转变中国文化的过程，对中国二十世纪文学乃至文化产生了至为深远的影响。而 “文理和合译本”以“本土化”为主的“处境化”方式的选择使它未能根据文化处境的 变化作出及时调整，甚至使基督教的“异质性”和“超越性”不可避免地被儒家文化同 化甚至消解，最终在那个“打倒旧文化”的文化转型期失去了立足的地方。 关键词：处境化、官话和合译本、文理和合译本、涵化、本土化 ABSTRACT : ―Contextualization‖ is an important issue of Chinese Christian theology. The Bible translation involves a large amount of problems such as conflict, accommodation and fusion which are between Christianity and native culture, so the studies on the Bible translation will provide a specific sample for the Christian contextualization issues. Mandarin Union Version and Wenli Union Version were published in 1919, but the former became the dominant version in China while the latter was never widely used, largely due to their different manners of contextualization. The ―acculturation‖ manner which were mainly adopted by the Mandarin Union Version made this version depends less on the Chinese canonical form, so it was able to be flexible when encountered the transformation of Chinese cultural context, and took an active part